Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cell phones are major invention of development of the science and engineering. It has several pros and cons on individuals' communication, in turn, whole society. Personally, I believe that smartphones occasioned large peril on our society. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people's live communication was reduced because of phones, so they do not understand each other's feelings comprehensively. Nowadays, most youngsters are always using their mobile phones even they are with their family and friends. Therefore, they are wasting their time for unnecessary matters such as mobile games instead of opening up their thoughts with others. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, I dated with a girl named Maral who is addicted in applications of phones. I wanted to discuss with her about our lifestyle and happy experience. Unfortunately, she was employing her phone instead of talking with me. As a result, we could not comprehend each other's feelings and viewpoint about life, so our date was completely destroyed due to the presence of her phone. If she had not been utilizing phone, we would have pleasant discussion and satisfactory relationship. This example demonstrates the aftermath of phones on our process of getting in touch with others, and investigating their standpoint.
Secondly, youngsters are squandering time by checking out their phone, which signifies that their possibility of developing the science, technology, and our society. Knowledge of human-being is their main power of inventing innovative stuffs. However, in modern society, adolescences are spending a huge amount of time for their phones instead of learning things such as their lesson. Thereby, they are nullifying their chance of employing their knowledge to create important and applicable things in order to improve our society. On the other hand, if they expend that time for necessary things, they can develop the life on the earth. To sum up, the rate of development of essential things might be decelerated because individuals are not studying things but using phones.
In summation, although phones have facilitated certain things on our life. However, its drawbacks are more influential and bigger than its advantages. This is because the extent of face-to-face communication decreased, and students are wasting their time instead of studying to develop our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...eering. It has several pros and cons on individuals communication, in turn, whole society. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, peoples live communicatio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1055, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, and investigating their standpoint. Secondly, youngsters are squandering tim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40568475452 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02815036996 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56330749354 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5312122915 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9565217391 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8260869565 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102958385315 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347476442886 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286146738331 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652989696886 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365206448646 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.