Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

From the stone age to the digital age, human race gone through major transitions and each of them meant to advance the standard of human life. Philosphers believed that constant in progress in science and technology is the vital part of development of society and humans as whole. Smartphones are one of the evidance that witnesses the advancement in technology. Some people believes that they cause more harm to our society and some people feels the other way. Personally, I believe smartphones are not causing and it is beneficial to humans.

Firstly, smartphones are like mini computers and people can perform various tasks with the help of it. For regular people, it can assist them in mundane tasks like calculations, data collections, reminders, etc. For software engineers, they can manage their whole day with their smartphones like attending meetings, mail discussions and even they can code if they have bigger displays. And a major advantage is that you can use internet with your smartphone which makes anything possible like reading newspaper, watching movies, listening songs, etc. These are examples of how people find it useful in their daily lives.

There are other scenarios where keeping smartphone will help you to spend less efforts. For example in the education field, the way students can learn has improved a lot which means they do not need to visit the library anymore and skim through many books. All of them will be available within a few clicks in their smartphones. Also, through video lectures it will become easier for the students to consume the information more effectively then before. On the contrary side, the information available in the internet may not be legit but along with the guidance of teachers it could be possible to use to effectively.

Despite the above mentioned facts, there are undeniable realities do exist where the smartphones are not used for good purpose or unintentionally causing problems. For example, children could get smartphone addiction because of the luring entertainment which could become hard for the parents to manage. On the other hand, some people use smartphones to peek into the private life of others and using their information for lucrative purposes which is hard to manage by people. Although it has the above-mentioned problems they can be prevented by taking relevant measures.

In conclusion, it is clear that smartphones are capable of doing great things if employed properly and if not the results could turn out differently. Of course, there are good and bad in whatever we take, but we chose to be good and that why the human race has made it this far. So we should take the collective effort to get the benefits from it.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eping smartphone will help you to spend less efforts. For example in the education f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oses which is hard to manage by people. Although it has the above-mentioned problems the...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, for example, in conclusion, of course, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05111111111 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73453000002 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548888888889 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.258512822 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.318181818 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192224482195 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537470243821 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435060878702 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972985641949 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211809801367 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.