Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Smartphones have become a part and parcel of everyone's life. No one can deny the fact that there are both positive and negative aspects of using a smartphone. I would disagree that smartphones have brought about ill-effects than positivity to a community. It is my firm belief that a smartphone has more important usefulness for several reasons, which I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, a few years back from now. We were dependent on books, the experience of other people, and other forms of paper-based resources to acquire knowledge. If we had to research or gather certain information on a topic, we had to visit libraries and refer to various materials which was a painstaking and time-consuming process. However, the introduction of smartphones has made it possible to get all this information at our fingertips. For example, If I was stuck with a problem of finding the correct algorithm to calculate the number of datasets required for my software to function correctly then it is just a matter of clicking a button and searching it online, and all the relevant information on that topic will be readily available for us to use. Therefore, smartphones have made it possible to every individual to have access to a vast array of information at the comfort of their home.
Secondly, using a smartphone can help us stay connected with our friends and families. Smartphones these days have become so much more user-friendly that anyone can use them and at the same time they have become affordable as well. Big companies are investing so much into research and development work to make a smartphone affordable and user-centric. For instance, one year ago, I was out to a different country for training during which I was able to stay connected with my family using calls, messages, and video technology. Therefore, smartphones have become affordable to every individual despite their social status and consequently, made it possible for everyone to stay connected with each other.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that smartphones can prove to be the best weapon in this digital era. It can aid people to stay connected and learn new things anywhere and everywhere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-13 | amchoi0810 | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | RAMJI JAISI BHUSAL | 60 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | poojansharma | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Pyae Pyae Aung | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | Pat_mat_345 | 70 | view |
- R robustus 78
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Make sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a member of a team than as an individual in order to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is necessary to be competitive in order to succeed in life Use specific reasons and examples to support your response 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03504043127 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03566754184 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549865229111 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2464948226 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.882352941 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165171522807 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571170426114 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419663879681 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998655653231 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618541903136 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.