Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
New advancement and technologies have made many lives easier than it was before. Those innovations also include the use of smartphones. Although some people believe that there are many negative consequences of using smartphones. In my opinion, I think that smartphones have made many tasks quite trouble-free. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent essay.
To begin with, only smartphones can save individuals from atrocious situations like crime. It can help people in case of any emergency. In other words, people can fully rely on their smartphones and call their loved ones if any sort of problem or disaster would happen. For instance, a couple of years ago, when I was coming back to home from school, somebody stole my purse and ran away. Thanks to this new innovation of smartphone that saved my life. I spontaneously called my parents and also got a chance to inform police about that event. As a result, that thief was caught by police and I got my purse back. If I had not had my smartphone, I would not be able to call police and my parents on right time.
Furthermore, smartphones at work can greatly help people in relieving stress during working hours. Making a quick call to friends and seeing a post on social media can help us from tension and anxiety that we usually get from work. As a corollary, we can be more productive at work. For example, in this pandemic, many people got laid off from my office, due to which workload have increased significantly. So, to keep myself active and freshen up, I decided to take a break for ten minutes from work every hour to keep my mind relax. I started to look funny posts on Facebook and on Twitter just to keep myself productive, and in this way I get to concentrate on my work easily. Therefore, smartphones keep individuals tension free.
All in all, smartphones can never cause harm to our society. This is because it can come handy in case of any kind of emergency and also because it keeps us stress free and make us more productive at work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-13 | amchoi0810 | 90 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | RAMJI JAISI BHUSAL | 60 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | poojansharma | 76 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Pyae Pyae Aung | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | Pat_mat_345 | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage Nutria is a beaver like rat sized approximately 24 inches long growing up to 20 pounds and usually living in semi aquatic habitats T 83
- Yellow cedar TPO 23 80
- TPO 33 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 70
- Casein based plastic packaging 71
- TPO 40 Human presence on Venus 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns also include the use of smartphones. Although some people believe that there are many...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...e my purse and ran away. Thanks to this new innovation of smartphone that saved my life. I spo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, kind of, sort of, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64835164835 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68090205735 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2073841654 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.9090909091 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927230928837 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314588313599 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434191090152 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659708301342 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310043465422 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.