Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should learn from the past.
The rapid development of our society makes the present world totally different with the past. Thus, some people reckon that the past experience and approaches are outdated for today’s problems so that it is unnecessary for us to learn from them. However, I firmly hold that we should still regard the past ideas as precious reference when facing some problems nowadays even in the future since we may meet the problems that previous people met and ideas in the past are the basis of contemporary development.
First and foremost, even though the world changes rapidly, the problems present people meet may be similar to those ancestors met before like problems in laws of mathematics and physics or mistakes in chemical experiments. Taking advantage of predecessors’ approaches is so effective and efficient for us to figure out the trouble. For example, when doing an experiment, I faced some mistakes that I had never met before. Surprisingly, the previous experimental notebooks provided a solution for me to solve the mistakes immediately to avoid the worse result. It is common and inevitable for us to meet the similar problems, and the old experience and solutions are absolutely great medicine for them.
Secondly, the truth current science develops on the foundation of previous technology also provides abundant justification for my opinion. For instance, some cutting edge of the modern physics derives from the relativity theory invented by Einstein and some pop music comes from the classical symphony in the eighteenth century. What’s more, as teachers frequently exhort us, reviewing the basic knowledge and examining whether we truly understand them or not contribute to deal with new problems. The necessity of learning from the past is also obvious to the laymen.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that the past ideas have been outdated in the quickly changing world. However, such point needs examining meticulously. The classic and excellent ideas are always shining in different era since varieties of people combine them with the characteristics of times they live in and explore the ways to solve problems. Like the patriotic poems and music, in the war period, they were created to eliminate the fear and encourage us to fight for our homeland, and in the peace period, them can are the great and significant way to form our cultural confidence and national identities when we face the global challenge. Therefore, using the diverse perspectives to interpret the past can get our wanted solutions.
In a nutshell, after more and more people are exposed to my article, I believe that they will come to realize that we cannot emphasize the significance of learning from the past too much in order to solve the problems we meet nowadays and in the future.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve the problems of the present and the future people should learn from the past 90
- The advice from older friends are more valuable than the advice from the friends your same age 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Working at home through telephone and computer is better than working in a company office 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...past. Thus, some people reckon that the past experience and approaches are outdated for today’s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16114790287 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83070043149 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7436865788 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223633987641 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067312081391 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627365721132 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132013749265 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731947212316 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.