In our life, there are important people who influence us a lot. Friends and teachers are the most influential people. Among these which one is more influential is a debatable topic. Some people think that teachers are more effective people on students but others think the opposite. I agree that teachers influence students more than their friends because of various reasons. In this short essay, I will try to explain why I think in this way.
First of all, teachers have an important authority over students and due to they rate them according to their performance, students try to act how their teachers expect from them. By doing this I try to convince their teachers that they are keeping their advice. For example, in high school one of my teachers was very sensitive about completing duties on time, this behavior caused me to be a person who is completing things before the deadline. As can clearly be seen from this example, students tend to act according to what their teachers expect from them.
Secondly, students learn most things directly from their teacher instead of their friends. Due to they learn it from their teachers, it is quite difficult to act the opposite. For example, a student learns how to write from his teacher. He will try to use the pencil as how his teacher shows him. One of my friends was using the pencil in a very strange way. When I asked him why he use it in such a way. He said that he learn this style from his teacher. This is an important example of how teachers can be influential even in a very simple issue.
In conclusion, whether students are more influenced by their teachers or their friends, I can say that it is a very complicated issue. I still think that teachers are more influential on students than friends.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news sources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1980s not to suppress natural forest fires The quot let it burn quot policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summe 60
- In the past century the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds in particular Unfortunately for birds these trends are likely to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...ry strange way. When I asked him why he use it in such a way. He said that he learn...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68051118211 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49502971307 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450479233227 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0954065472 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.25 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349985616256 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128406234501 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12638985234 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256805952902 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732987378399 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...ry strange way. When I asked him why he use it in such a way. He said that he learn...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68051118211 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49502971307 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450479233227 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0954065472 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.25 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349985616256 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128406234501 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12638985234 0.0737576698707 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256805952902 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732987378399 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.5 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.