Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books.
There is no doubt that reading books is one of the best ways to increase people’s level of knowledge. They are an excellent resource for learning about history, science, and a number of other academic fields since they offer in-depth information on a wide range of topics. On the other hand, movies have the potential to be just as informative as books. I am going to give you three reasons why.
Books have the potential to be more interesting than movies. Let us face it: reading may be a rather boring activity. Reading may be a tough activity for many people since it requires them to remain still for extended amounts of time. Movies, on the other hand, have a much greater ability to captivate audiences. Because they are both aesthetically pleasing and typically feature both action and tension, they have the potential to hold the attention of a viewer for the entirety of the presentation.
It's possible for movies to cover a lot of material in a relatively short length of time. It's possible that a story that would take hundreds of pages to tell in a book may be conveyed in just two hours of cinema. Students who want to learn about a certain topic but have a limited amount of time may find this to be of great assistance. For instance, a movie on the American Revolution may cover a lot of material in a short period. It can describe the war itself in a manner that a book could never accomplish, as well as introduce the important characters, show the significant events leading up to the war, and show the major events throughout the fight.
Films, as opposed to books, have the ability to leave a long-lasting impression. Because movies are so engaging to the eye, people tend to remember them better than reading texts. Students who need to recollect knowledge for the sake of tests or papers can benefit from this. If a student reads a history textbook and then watches a documentary on the same subject, they are more likely to remember the information from the documentary than they are from the textbook. This is a result of the documentary bringing history to life through the use of visuals and music, as opposed to the textbook, which places a predominant emphasis on words. In addition, seeing a movie is likely to be more pleasurable than reading a book, which increases the likelihood that we will pay attention and remember what we have seen on screen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-23 | rodriannnn | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
- Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office 90
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion B 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Online classes in which you communicate with your professors and other students only by computer offer more advantages and benefits to students than traditional classes on a college campus 86
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, well, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69358669834 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67079719896 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524940617577 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6532081906 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196691716219 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513885772584 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030707609802 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112916058774 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260564312957 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, well, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69358669834 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67079719896 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524940617577 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6532081906 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196691716219 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513885772584 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030707609802 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112916058774 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260564312957 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.