Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
People are always looking for ways of being successful in their jobs. Some people think they have to study hard in school in order to be successful. Others think the ability to relate well to people is the key to success. But, the reality is that these two factors are of equal importance.
For one thing, it is important to study hard in school because some knowledge can be achieved only by studying. Let's take a psychologist as an example. A psychologist might have the ability to relate well to people and actually this skill can help him a lot with his job, But still, he needs to know the science of psychology very well to help his patients. A lot of people avoid studying well in school and college because they think that their social skills are sufficient for their success. But when they start working they would face a lot of deficiencies and also they might cause problems to some of their patients or customers. In the previous example, the psychologist might lead his patient into suicide by giving wrong pieces of advice, therefore, studying hard is inevitable.
On the other hand, sheer studying would not necessarily contribute to our success. Another factor that is equally important is the social skill and in other words, the ability to relate well to people. Take a manager as an example. A manager might have a very authentic degree of management, but yet, might not be able to manage a company. Obviously, management is not feasible without an appropriate social ability. A manager confronts several challenges in a company, for example, the workers might protest and ask for more salary while the company is not in a favorable economic situation. At this point, the only leverage that the manager has is his ability to socially relate to people. The workers might perceive the adverse condition of the company by an appropriate speech. Thus, it is one thing to know the principals of management, but another to have the intuitive ability of management.
All in all, in order to be successful, not only should people study hard in school but also they should improve their social abilities. These two factors are the two keys for success and are of equal importance.
- The reading passage provides three methods to reduce the salinity of the Salton Sea. However, the professor claims that the ways stated in the passage are not realistic or practical and refutes each of them using the following points.First, she argues tha 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 70
- Compare and contrast your way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Nowadays, children rely too much on technology, like computers, smartphone, video games for fun and entertainment. playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children's development. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ledge can be achieved only by studying. Lets take a psychologist as an example. A ps...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, look, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for one thing, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79419525066 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6154026656 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448548812665 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2955801447 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5238095238 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259109570792 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794529737975 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729921046381 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173989684864 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547828508079 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.