Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is generally acknowledged that both views, being able to communicate, and having a suitable level of education are having a profound impact on our future job. However, as for me, I prefer to gain good ability in learning things and accumulating knowledge.
First, given the status quo, If we all know how a high level of knowledge might be highly beneficial for us, we will try to attain various knowledge. The fact is, knowledge is an important element in a future job and as opposed to relationships with others. While individuals gain knowledge in a variety of disciplines, they could reach higher stages of life and be more successful, because achievements come from science. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was younger, I have chosen to work immediately after graduation from high school without gaining a university degree. At that time, I proud myself to be able to find a career, but after a while, I found out without having enough knowledge, it would not be practical and only relations could not help me in the long run. Based on that experience, I think that it was better to study and complete my proper education, then hiring for a career so as to be more successful.
Furthermore, even though there really are some people who lack real ability such as good specialty or learning new things who can thrive for good relations with other people, they are not really successful. They might occupy some high-ranked positions such as managers or chairmen, but they lack the required ability. All the other coworkers would just despise them, and the resulting gossips and bad performance would drive them away. In the end, they will fail. It is one who acquires the needed ability can succeed really, not ones with good relations.
All in all, by taking all the points into account, I vehemently oppose with the statement due to the reasons mentioned above. Not only studying hard reach us to a better future job, but also having a good job comes from a high level of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affect 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 928, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...per education, then hiring for a career so as to be more successful. Furthermore, even...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, then, while, as for, as to, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78285714286 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70596619735 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7204481059 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154343959969 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478671830683 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394097060655 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936114124089 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278359435791 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 928, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...per education, then hiring for a career so as to be more successful. Furthermore, even...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, then, while, as for, as to, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78285714286 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70596619735 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7204481059 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154343959969 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478671830683 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394097060655 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936114124089 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278359435791 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.