Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
Taking risks and doing new things have always been a hotly debate among most people. Some believe that in order to do your job well, you should stick to the experience, in my point of view; however, creativity and invention come from new challenges. I will elaborate on these in the following paragraphs.
In the first place, we should not neglect the importance of creativity and its contribution in humans life. Trying new things and innovative ideas have always initiated with some radical problems, because the unknown world and new ways might be erroneous. imagine a world without creativity, all individual repeat the same routines. In this case, how evolution could emerge? Our ancestors have taken the risk of doing a new thing, as a result, today we have industrial types of equipment. We also should be courageous, and try new things for the convenience of the new generation and ourselves as well.
Moreover, some individuals hold the view that trying new things is time-consuming as well as costly. On the other hand, I strongly believe that we should pay the expenses of trying new things. Take the invention of electricity as an example; if the ingenious person would not courageous enough to take the risk and try a novel idea, how the world today would look like. The industrial revolution could not take place without the new inventions. Although all of them have a tremendous cast in the beginning, in the long run, their profits have been several times greater.
To sum up, the most precious commodity in our life is a certain amount of years that we have to see the bizarre world. if we stick to the cliches and do not take a risk, we prohibit ourselves from the experiences that we could have taken. So in the elder ages, we regret the opportunities that we left. The price for the new things should be paid regardless of their risks to avoid such regrets.
- dinosaurs' migration 80
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('hotly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...s and doing new things have always been a hotly debate among most people. Some believe that in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Imagine
... world and new ways might be erroneous. imagine a world without creativity, all individ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... that we have to see the bizarre world. if we stick to the cliches and do not take...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, as a result, as well as, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81651376147 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65316913439 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1318943412 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243543425712 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783200421021 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641270387921 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168186834929 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576328273945 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.