There are different opinions on whether teachers should talk about their social or political stance in their classes or not. Although some people think that stating these issues by teachers is neither necessary nor decent, I believe otherwise, maintaining that it is vital that teachers talk about these stuff to their students since it is crucial for their education process and widens their minds. In what follows, I will delve into these reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason in this regard is that mentioning personal opinions about social and political issues by teachers have a positive impact on the students' education. In schools, overall, there are two kinds of courses. The first category of courses incorporates proven principles and equations, such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and so on. Government can not manipulate the content of these courses since they contain genuine equations and stuff having been proven by scientists. On the other hand, in the second, which includes those courses about sociology, politics, etc., the government can easily interfere and change its contents in its favor. Hence, if teachers did not teach their students extra stuff and did not talk about their views on political or social matters, their students would never learn about the accurate and intact aspects of these subjects. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests that teachers should talk about their social or political views to educate their students better.
Although the aforementioned reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, there is another remarkable point deserving some words here, which is concerned with helping students to acquire broader viewpoints on political or social issues. In many schools, different teachers teach different courses and see problems through their perspectives based on their backgrounds. For example, a mathematics teacher's view on a social or political problem differs significantly from a sociology teacher's on the same problem. If teachers talk about their personal opinions about political or social issues, which are everyday topics, the students will benefit from getting acquainted with various aspects of a same problem. Consequently, when they face such problems in the future, they are able to think outside of the box and cope with those problems more effectively. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that if teachers talk about their personal opinions on social and political stuff, they assist their students in thinking better and more effectively.
All in all, many people are in favor of the fact that teachers should not be allowed to talk about their perspectives on political or social stuff in their classes; nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to the conclusion that this subject is not only beneficial but is it is also an integral part of education. This is because it is both helpful for the students' educational process and helps them think outside the box when they counter political or social problems in the future.
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First th 80
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 73
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest fi 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... teachers have a positive impact on the students education. In schools, overall, there a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35463917526 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70822211048 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465979381443 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.9 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6703508727 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.277777778 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9444444444 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24899344638 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969953477117 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759535727708 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176970219466 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204818090669 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.