Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Schools can use many methods to motivate their teachers and raise the quality of their works. However, paying teachers based on the amount of learning their students have had is wrong. This method cannot work because it does not take into account the differences between people. In addition, it will produces negative pressure on the weak students. Moreover, it may force teachers into favoritism.
First, evaluating a teacher based on the amount of knowledge the students have learned, is equal to expecting all the students of a class to be the same. This, however, is contradictory to our knowledge about human IQ. Almost everyone knows that different people have different IQ levels, and therefore, they have different learning abilities. Thus, it is predictable that the project will fail because not all the students are going to learn all the material in a class.
Second, evaluating teachers in this way may encourage teachers to put extra pressure on the student who are slower in learning. Putting pressure on students will not improve their learning ability. However, there are methods that a good teacher can use to help his students become more motivated and engaging, yet those methods may take long time to take effect. A teacher, who is under the pressure of being evaluated in that way, may not choose the best method, but prefer a short-term solution instead. These methods can result in an increase in the number of dropouts in long-term.
Finally, teachers may show favoritism in their class both consciously and unconsciously. Because the teacher knows that a good student means more money, they subconsciously may like that student more ,and more often act in her favor in the class. Even worse, a teacher may use favoritism as a way of provoking slower students to try to do more. Regardless of the motives, favoritism can never provide a good environment for learning.
As a whole, it is good to try to make students learn better and more, however, paying teachers based on how much students learn will only have the opposite consequences.
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 74
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known resembl 78
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 67
Sentence: In addition, it will produces negative pressure on the weak students.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to will and produces
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 165 200
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1673 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.863 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.576 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.105 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5