Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Schools can use many methods to motivate their teachers and raise the quality of their works. However, paying teachers based on the amount of learning their students have had is wrong. This method cannot work because it does not take into account the differences between people. In addition, it will produces negative pressure on the weak students. Moreover, it may force teachers into favoritism.
First, evaluating a teacher based on the amount of knowledge the students have learned, is equal to expecting all the students of a class to be the same. This, however, is contradictory to our knowledge about human IQ. Almost everyone knows that different people have different IQ levels, and therefore, they have different learning abilities. Thus, it is predictable that the project will fail because not all the students are going to learn all the material in a class.
Second, evaluating teachers in this way may encourage teachers to put extra pressure on the student who are slower in learning. Putting pressure on students will not improve their learning ability. However, there are methods that a good teacher can use to help his students become more motivated and engaging, yet those methods may take long time to take effect. A teacher, who is under the pressure of being evaluated in that way, may not choose the best method, but prefer a short-term solution instead. These methods can result in an increase in the number of dropouts in long-term.
Finally, teachers may show favoritism in their class both consciously and unconsciously. Because the teacher knows that a good student means more money, they subconsciously may like that student more ,and more often act in her favor in the class. Even worse, a teacher may use favoritism as a way of provoking slower students to try to do more. Regardless of the motives, favoritism can never provide a good environment for learning.
As a whole, it is good to try to make students learn better and more, however, paying teachers based on how much students learn will only have the opposite consequences.
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 67
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 10
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 65
Sentence: In addition, it will produces negative pressure on the weak students.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Suggestion: Refer to will and produces
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 165 200
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 344 350
No. of Characters: 1673 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.307 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.863 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.576 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.105 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.316 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5