Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.

Through the human history, people have always shown the respect to their own or their children's teachers, but in different ways and levels. Personally, I agree that in the past teachers were more appreciated, than their colleagues in these days. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, there were very few and limited masters in societies before, and almost there were no replacement for each of them. When something, including a specific professional, a certain commodity, and so on, is limited in number it has naturally more value in view of customers and users. Nowadays, however, many educated persons are known as a teacher which makes them not so much special. Parents are aware that they can always find another teacher for their student childs, and are not dependent on one of them.

Second of all, in the past, being a educator was not an official vocation, which means that were not paid regularly. Although some people which were capable and rich gave money to their children's master, but it was occasionally and as a voluntarily donation. Today, on the other hand, some persons are teacher as their source of income, and have a salary paid by government, meaning people taxes, or private school which charges parents every year. As a result, society to some extent considered teachers as a employees who do their job in order to make a living. So, they received less value than the teachers in past did.

In conclusion, I om of the opinion that currently individuals value the ones who teach people, less than past societies did. That is because the number of teachers has raised significantly, and also because in past years some of them did that work almost for free and without any expectation of being paid.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-19 nusybah 60 view
2020-01-19 nusybah 61 view
2020-01-15 mazenghonem 70 view
2020-01-10 Sarrraaa 68 view
2020-01-10 Opak Pulup 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user moeinynsi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nally, I agree that in the past teachers were more appreciated, than their collea...
^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Second of all, in the past, being a educator was not an official vocation, ...
^
Line 9, column 236, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('voluntarily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('donation') instead of another adjective.
... master, but it was occasionally and as a voluntarily donation. Today, on the other hand, some persons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 509, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y to some extent considered teachers as a employees who do their job in order to ...
^
Line 9, column 509, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: a employee; employees
...y to some extent considered teachers as a employees who do their job in order to make a liv...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85947712418 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57364715988 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571895424837 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7428600799 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254854698545 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931265405491 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782912730705 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14742016055 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134814649081 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.