Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

While in the past there was fewer waste produced at homes, today because the world population has raised significantly, huge amount of domestic waste is being produced every single day. Personally, I believe that introducing legislations cannot cause a remarkable jump in the rate of recycling by itself. I feel this way for two reasons.

First of all, laws are not capable to force people to do something in their private spaces, including their own home. Obviously, executing the laws needs observing and controling people who must obey. It is not possible to watch people in their houses, and even if it was, it is a violation of freedom. As a result, the legal requirements might not be performed by majority of people. My experience is a compelling example of this. For many years, it was forbidden to drink alcohols in my country. people were fined if police catch them drinking in every possible places. But consequently, according to reports people were drinking in their homes, even more than countries which people were allowed to.

Second of all, although some legislations would eventually become a part of a nation's culture, but it is not true for all cases. Individuals may obey the rules as much as they have to, but most of the time once that rule is eliminated, they will do what was prohibited, again. So, if governments tend to alter citizens' behaviour permanently, alternative measures should be taken into account. For instance, they can encourage people to deliver their house waste separately, which is needed for a proper recycling process, through giving them free commodities instead, such as books.

On the other hand, it should be noticed that regulations direct social attitudes and accelerate the alteration toward a more suitable trend. It is not realistic to think that only by advertisment and giving prizes we can obtain all persons' attention and motivate them to co-operate in recycling process. A fair law is able to ease that.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that although rules are always necessary to stop society from its inappropriate behaviour, but they can just help as a complementary action. In this special subject, it is not doable to control individuals at their private space, and also it might not lead to a permanent change in attitude.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-10 ThHuong 61 view
2024-06-10 ThHuong 56 view
2023-11-19 paniz_kiani 56 view
2023-11-19 paniz_kiani 56 view
2023-11-19 paniz_kiani 73 view
Essays by user moeinynsi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...bidden to drink alcohols in my country. people were fined if police catch them drinkin...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'report'.
Suggestion: report
... places. But consequently, according to reports people were drinking in their homes, ev...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ent and giving prizes we can obtain all persons attention and motivate them to co-opera...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, while, as for, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02083333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83639540419 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606770833333 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2539945401 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290300676986 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673748845964 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516035816486 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12608078912 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063409689078 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.