Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

At present, the numerous technologies have dramatically influenced everyone significantly affecting skills of children, not only physical skills but also creative skills. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with creative abilities of children in the past more than in the present because of technology, and I feel this way for three reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, no other libraries in the world are as gigantic as the internet which finds almost information on it. Approximately children enjoy in the internet world because it has a lot of creative animation games and for actually convenient learning more than finding books at a library in the past. For example, some children would like to know the behaviour of native animals of other countries, and they cannot go to the library because it closed. They use the internet for investigating it. Furthermore, learning on the internet still sharing some creative ideas or brainstorm with their friends who live in another country.

Without a doubt, technology has also provided some new creative ideas to implement. At modern, children search for copious creative ideas to make fundamental food on the internet. Similarly, the children find various alternatives which may aid them in his developing new creative ideas. To illustrate, when I was a kid, I would like to cook the fire-egg rice consisting of more ingredients and somewhat weird such as butter, honey milk and water replacing a cooking oil.

Last but not least, the technology in the present, it still encourages more imagination of children more than grandparent era. For instance, they may like to creative design social media by themselves such as blog, website and Facebook that they may make some stories and imagination to explain that this is their styles. As a result, children are practised and developing their skills. Precisely, the parents' era had not a lot of the technologies which seem the modern time. Although some technologies may be difficult things for children, they should learn to improve their knowledge of the future.

In conclusion, most children need to learn for improving their creative skills which technology is a main important factor to children. The more children understand creative technology, the better they will achieve success in the future. Technology has made children more creative than their grandparents and parents era.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-01 aaronahmed 3 view
2023-04-21 sonyeoso 76 view
2023-04-10 Yam Kumar Oli 66 view
2022-11-16 anman 87 view
2022-11-16 anman 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user thonsapon83 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...developing their skills. Precisely, the parents era had not a lot of the technologies w...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27319587629 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86211427239 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.782092569 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.684210526 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220430229665 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801426401859 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463951079156 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140418510896 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429070361639 0.0645574589148 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.