In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about whether universities should invest in sports and social activities. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds that sports and social activities are as important as the latter so they should be received equal financial support as classes and libraries. This paper will examine why I agree with this statement.
On one hand, what draws much of my attention is the study success. It cannot be denied that playing sports is synonymous with doing exercise. By dint of this, students stand a golden chance to activate their bodies after a learning day. Thanks to this it is possible for them to burn many calories they imported every day. During this process, there is a likelihood for learners to open their minds. Accordingly, this leads to the fact that this probably gives rise to increasing students’ performance. In the same fashion, having social activities is closely related to meeting with the liked minded. By virtue of this, people are prone to reflect themselves with others. Under those circumstances, they have the tendency to know their strengths and weakness. During this process, students are capable of being their better version. Eventually, it makes it possible for learners to get high performance in their studies. By and large, for the most part sports and social activities greatly contribute to success in study work.
On the other hand, some people express a different point of view that playing sports and social activities are too time consuming. As a consequence, it completely hinders people from being successful. Having said that, it is just the surface of the matter. People have already scheduled. Thereupon, everything is completely under control. This, indeed, proves that time wasting is totally avoidable. In addition to this, another point often overlooked is that even if misspend time does exist, it should be considered as the chance for students to have more time away from learning. On account of this, people have the inclination to relax themselves. During this process, they are given the opportunity to generate more creative ideas. In light of this, students have the potential to smoothen their work. As a result, it brings about high performance for learners. This, without doubt, empowers them to be happy every time. Beyond any doubt, people should put off the idea that playing sports and social activities leads to students’ stress.
In summary, study improvement is the convincing reason for my choice. It is my hope that universities and colleges take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding whether universities and colleges should invest in sports and social activities.
- In order to enjoy job satisfaction it is better for workers to take different kinds of jobs instead of doing similar jobs all their lives 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 85
- Why people should go short distance by bike 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dents’ performance. In the same fashion, having social activities is closely rela...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, regarding, so, then, in addition, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20945945946 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72825384536 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6776157826 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177396876732 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436652305435 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655296971902 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150055588762 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108803188251 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.