In order to enjoy job satisfaction, it is better for workers to take different kinds of jobs instead of doing similar jobs all their lives.
There has been an increasing interest in job selection lately. There is a considerable body of opinion which holds that being in charge of different types of jobs is more beneficial for the sake of job satisfaction than remaining on the same career path throughout one’s life. This paper will examine the reasons why I am in favor of the statement.
On one hand, what convinces me is career enjoyment. It cannot be denied that taking different kinds of jobs is synonymous with gathering experience in numerous fields. As a matter of fact, workers are likely to gain an excellent background with knowledge in a great deal of areas. Under those circumstances, they have the tendency to enjoy a smooth work life, as they are likely to experience few conflicts due to their wide range of expertise. In the event of this, employees have the incentive to produce great work output. This leads to the fact that they are able to find pleasure in their careers. In the same fashion, when people participate in many distinct occupations, appreciation of labor is inevitable. Thanks to this, they are prone to be highly motivated to repay their gratitude. As a result, there is likelihood for workers to stay completely focused at work. During this process, they have the potential to achieve notable success. Eventually, this probably gives rise to vocational contentment. Indeed, the fact that these factors contribute to career enjoyment proves that involvement in multiple vocations leads to job satisfaction.
On the other hand, some people might say that participating in different types of jobs takes up too much time. Hence, it creates a huge burden on career contentment. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. Workers have already developed meticulous and intensive plans in advance. Therefore, time management is kept completely under control since no duties could disrupt workers’ personal lives. This, indeed, proves that workers’ time schedules are not really affected. Another point overlooked is that even if time mismanagement exists, it should be considered as the opportunity for employees to get exposed to unfamiliar situations. Thanks to this, they are given the chance to reflect on their personal developments. As a result, people have the inclination to recognize their strengths and weaknesses. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to become better versions of themselves and improve on their work. Beyond any doubt, they have the motivation to grow more confident. This, indeed, enables individuals to lead stress-free work lives. By and large, the idea that engagement in multiple occupations aggravates stress is often possible to end in collapse.
In brief, career satisfaction is the convincing reason for my approval. It is my hope that future workers take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding career paths.
- In order to enjoy job satisfaction it is better for workers to take different kinds of jobs instead of doing similar jobs all their lives 86
- Why people should go short distance by bike 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, really, regarding, so, therefore, in brief, as a matter of fact, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22457627119 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92326129276 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563559322034 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7771388835 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36666666667 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 26.0 11.8709677419 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218889510888 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492621549499 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619712002488 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1439141437 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528262014311 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.