Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Without a shadow of a doubt, posing adequate knowledge about a country plays a pivotal role in its citizens' assimilating its greatness in a myriad of facets, not to mention grasping its ongoing circumstances. An unanswered question in this area is whether attending museums is the most efficient approach to gaining expertise about the country. Despite all the arguments asserting that visiting museums is a substantial waste of time due to subtle modifications on concepts or relics, I believe otherwise, maintaining that museums provide an enormous amount of meticulous details which effectively conveys necessary understandings about a country. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, Museums manifest the genuine remnants, either residual instruments or conceptual stories, from previous the history of a country. To put it more simply, Museums intend to collect ancient artifacts and preserve actual historical occasions chronologically, which reveals a colossal amount of information. Therefore, individuals can learn crucial points about their country. On the other hand, if people merely have the chance to acquire the rudiment knowing about their country during their school or university curriculums, there are likely to be confused without seeing tangible evidence. My personal experience is a convincing example of this. Back in high school, my history professor endeavored to illustrate all points in the book, yet, lots of students could not thoroughly imagine the ancient equipment. As a result, she arranged a tour of various museums in our city in regard to our subjects in the class. Needless to say, our understanding of the country took a leap forward with seeing all those maps, old economy descriptions, and a host of other fascinating things which could have never made us learn this way.
Another reason worthwhile mentioning is that Museums teem with adept people in the realm of a country's history, economy, and geography, who can better explain the perplexing issues. In other words, experts can utterly explain specific periods in multiple aspects, which struct organized information about the hometown. Besides, people can readily ask questions of the museums' staff in order to solve their confusion, seeding the plants of comprehensive knowledge. In addition, people can hang out with their friends in museums and discuss its assorted sections after it, making their leisure time more efficient. For instance, consider a group of students who have questions that are not fulfilled at their courses prevalent to their country. They can visit a museum and discuss their problems with the adroit people working there. Hence, they will also learn new things, their questions will be answered, and they can have a lot of fun having a conversation about their country, and thus see each other's perspectives.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that visiting museums exerts a beneficial influence on people's attitudes and mindsets about their country. This is because not only do museums provide tangible evidence, which can help individuals superbly obtain knowledge, but they also have experts who can answer people's questions in related realms.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, in other words, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2777.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47731755424 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88287494487 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6276901309 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.238095238 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182744952568 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556111089003 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391377931468 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117141685548 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00895898770646 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 86.8835125448 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.247311828 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.