Museums, a country's significant element, have been valued and even triggered heated discussion. In some people's views, visiting museums may not be a good way to learn about a country. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that visiting museums is the best way to discover a country due to the contribution to efficiency and historical knowledge.
Visiting museums is an efficient approach to learning about a country because it enables us to minimize the time spent on it. To be specific, museums provide us with the most important components of a country's origin and development. Scrutinizing these historical elements enables us to have deep insight into the country's sources, culture and language. Thus, we can learn about a country in a relatively short time. In addition, volunteers, who can better elucidate perplexing historical issues, always afford an enormous number of meticulous details. And our confusions are always answered by them timely, which also accelerates our construction of a historical knowledge base. On the contrary, we probably can not learn about a country quickly if we are not equipped with such key materials and instruction. Moreover, discovering a country through museums also reduces errors, thus making it efficient. In detail, the exhibited materials, such as paintings and ancient artifacts, are authentic. And their historical explanation is also strictly defined by the local museum administration. That means there are fewer errors. However, we may confront a great deal of misinformation if we learn about a country in haphazard ways, such as by surfing the Internet. Therefore, visiting museums is a productive manner to learn about a country because it can reduce time and errors.
Visiting museums is conducive to scrutinizing a country because it supplies us with a large quantity of knowledge. The materials exhibited in the museums come from a variety of time periods. For instance, you can immerse yourself in the paintings from the era when people lead a nomadic lifestyle to the modern time. In addition, you can also find materials from a wide range of territories. For example, you can get access to the tools used by Asian and American people. Thus, museums always provide you with a wide range of knowledge. Hence, visiting museums is beneficial to study a country.
It seems that travelling to a country is also a superior way to learn about it. It is because one can learn about a country's culture and language by travelling to different places and communicating with various residents. Through communication, we can also comprehend historical events. However, travelling sometimes is not the best way to learn about a country owing to the cost of travel. Specifically, we need to pay for air tickets, travel insurance, expensive hotels, etc. Thus, our travelling time is limited by our budget, which is detrimental for us to learn about a country.
To conclude, visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country because we can get access to plenty of knowledge efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elucidate perplexing historical issues, always afford an enormous number of meti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1898989899 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01032200395 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450505050505 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1025838684 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6333333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.56666666667 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361917891634 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108983188363 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886873984687 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243902702804 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418402051749 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.