Museums, a country's significant element, have been valued and even trigger heated discussion. In some people's views, visiting museums may not be a good way to learn about a country. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country due to the contribution to efficiency and historical knowledge.
Visiting museums is an efficient approach to learn about a country. It enables us to minimize the time spend on learning a country. To be specific, museums provide us with the most important components about a country's originality and development. Srcutinizing these historical elements enables us to have deep insight into the country's sources, culture and language. Thus, we can learn about a country in a relatively short time. In addition, volunteers in the museum also explain historial concepts and events in detail, and we can be free to raise questions, which also acclerate our construction of historical knowledge base. On the contrary, we probably can not learn about a country quickly if we are not provided with such key materials and instruction. Moreover, learning about a country from museums also reduce errors, thus making it efficient. In detail, the exihibited mateials, such as paintings and antiques, are authentic. That is to say, there are less erros. However, we may confront a great deal of misinformation if we do not learn from museum. Therefore, visiting museums is an productive manner to learn about a country because it can reduce time and errors.
Visiting museums is conducive to learn a country because it supply us with a large quantity of knowledge. The materials exihibited in the museums come from a variety of time periods. For example, you can immerse yourself in the paintings from time when people lead a nomadic lifestyles to modern time. In addition, you can also find materials from a wide range of territory. For example, you can get access to the tools used by Asian and American people from thousands years ago. Thus, museums always provides you with a wide range of knowledge. Hence, visiting museum is beneficial to study a country.
It seems that traveling in a country is also a superior way to learn about it. It is because one can learn about a country's culture and language by traveling to different places and communicate with various residents. Through the communication, we can also understand the historical events. However, traveling sometimes is not the best way to learn about a country owing to the cost of travel. Specifically, we need to pay for air tickets, travel insurence, expensive hotels, etc. Thus, our traveling time is limited by our budget, which is detrimental for us to learn about a country.
To conclude, visiting museum is the best way to learn about a country because of we can get access to plenty of knowledge efficiently.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1096, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... museum. Therefore, visiting museums is an productive manner to learn about a coun...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lifestyle'?
Suggestion: lifestyle
...gs from time when people lead a nomadic lifestyles to modern time. In addition, you can al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because we' instead.
Suggestion: because we
...s the best way to learn about a country because of we can get access to plenty of knowledge e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.035639413 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8867505847 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431865828092 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5122632395 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8275862069 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4482758621 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389417695397 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124670619233 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094888303697 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260963312101 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493215998549 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1096, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... museum. Therefore, visiting museums is an productive manner to learn about a coun...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lifestyle'?
Suggestion: lifestyle
...gs from time when people lead a nomadic lifestyles to modern time. In addition, you can al...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because we' instead.
Suggestion: because we
...s the best way to learn about a country because of we can get access to plenty of knowledge e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.035639413 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8867505847 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431865828092 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5122632395 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8275862069 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4482758621 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79310344828 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389417695397 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124670619233 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094888303697 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260963312101 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493215998549 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.