Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The epoch-making innovation of the internet has changed our lives' shape, and has provided differenet communicating methods for humankind. Some people hold a positive perspective toward the use of the internet in their educations and carears, while others believe that it is better to use the traditional ways for their communications instead of the internet. I subscribe to these group and I strongly think that to work more productive for a project , it is better to meet in person rather than using e-mail.
To begin with, despite any benefits that the internet and specifically e-mail have brought about, communicating by e-mail could be misleading and confusing. In fact, face to face, discussing about a part of work will prompt lucrative outcomes because arguments through the e-mail or virtual platforms somewhat cause many misperception, and in some way may be offensive as well. My personal experience is a pursuasive example of what I mean. last month, I had a communal project with my colleagues, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic we all have to work remotely. In the middle of the project, I confronted to a problem which I cannot cope with it lonely. I used the internet and sent an e-mail to one of my colleagues explaining about my issue, but the received e-mail surprised me. She didn't understand my point of view and rejected all of my proposal parts of the project. I became desperate and without any hope, continued my efforts to come up with a novel idea. However, after two days, she sent me another e-mail and appolagized me for how she wrote that e-mail. She asserted that through the virtual contact, it is possible to have misunderstanding. This example demonstrates how it it important to talk and argue about an aspect of project in person.
What's more, to avoid squandering time and energy, it is practical to meet our associations in person. By e-mail, it could waste of time describing a fact without any efficiency as expected. As an illustration, consider the example mentioned previously, I have time-wasting for two days working on unnecessary subject, which would be more profitable if we could talk about my problem face to face.
To put it in a nutshell, I firmly believe that communicating with coworkers or classmates in real world is more useful than through virtual media. Using e-mail could cause may misunderstanding and wasting of time and effort, while in person it is easier to despute and concur.
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at to work more productive for a project , it is better to meet in person rather t...
^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun misperception seems to be countable; consider using: 'many misperceptions'.
Suggestion: many misperceptions
...ail or virtual platforms somewhat cause many misperception, and in some way may be offensive as we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...is a pursuasive example of what I mean. last month, I had a communal project with my...
^^^^
Line 2, column 785, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t the received e-mail surprised me. She didnt understand my point of view and rejecte...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...standing. This example demonstrates how it it important to talk and argue about an as...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... about an aspect of project in person. Whats more, to avoid squandering time and ene...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, i mean, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94890510949 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99737529321 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532846715328 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1492446629 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273279075606 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821590778509 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493226235279 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154582901259 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590018613152 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.