Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

In today's complex and progressive world, people could make communication with various ways such as e-mails, social medias,… . In university or company, people need to communicated in different fields to succeed in their projects. Nowadays, individuals try different techniques for being in touch with each other. Some people prefer to communicate by e-mail with their classmates or colleagues about a project. Others prefer to prefer to meet face to face. From my vantage point, communicating in person with our colleagues is more effective than e-mails. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will discuss in the following essay.
First of all, communicating by e-mails has a high risk of making mistakes, and other people cannot get accurate messages. Some time writing passages cannot describe the correct meaning to other persons, and it can change the meaning. Most of the time, even one word can change the meaning, or because of tiredness, people cannot read correctly and understand what we are talking about. Moreover, people can explain their purpose face to face more easily. For example, when I was a university student, I had lots of projects. We should do them in a group at the end of the term. We used to get together and share our information and data. Then we get a good result. One time, I tried it by sending several messages, and my classmate misunderstood my information. We had to try it again and face to face.
Secondly, time is an important factor in doing projects. Most of the time, doing projects from long distances and with e-mail can waste peoples' time. For instance, sending an e-mail will take much more time than communicating face to face. Some time to clarify our massage we have to several e-mails. Beginning with thinking of suitable words to write, sending the e-mail, and waiting for the partner to do the same thing can take too much time. On the contrary, in a face-to-face meeting, people can talk for an hour and explain every minute detail to each other.
In conclusion, from my point of view, it's better classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person for two main reasons. First, it decreases the risk of making mistakes in projects, and second, students or employees can save more time.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ious ways such as e-mails, social medias,… . In university or company, people need...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s ways such as e-mails, social medias,… . In university or company, people need t...
^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'prefer to'.
Suggestion: prefer to
...s or colleagues about a project. Others prefer to prefer to meet face to face. From my vantage poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents or employees can save more time.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, talking about, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91122715405 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71725169242 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532637075718 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8931847044 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.24 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.32 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218422770588 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657009593272 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837226333751 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157704046472 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663846794316 0.0645574589148 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.