Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
New technologies provide us the opportunity of more quick communication with our partners in work or study places through ways like e-mails. Regardless of this benefit, It may sometimes cause some misunderstanding or confusion. I prefer to send and receive my work-related messages directly in person instead of sending them via e-mail. There are two reasons why I subscribe to this idea which are separately elaborated hereunder.
First, Using indirect means of communication like e-mail always has the risk of misconception. I feel this way because no one can add intonations, that have the capability to alter the meaning, to the message. As a result, it may convey a false tone to our receiver. Take a personal experience as an example, one of my colleagues asked me by e-mail to fill out the excel sheets of daily data that he previously created himself. But, I didn't get the meaning correctly and begin to prepare those sheets from the beginning. This miscommunication wasted lots of my time and had no results at all. On the contrary, if he asked me in person, there was the possibility to see my concern about the hard work needed. Therefore he would explain the request clearly.
Second, with direct contact, there is faster feedback available and this repeated feedbacks leads to more modification of the project. Normally, each project has a time plan or schedule that shows the importance of time management during the process. So, anything that can reduce the time is very valuable. I believe that when members of a group that working with each other talk in person, they answer each other's questions very faster and improve their ways of performing tasks quickly. In my personal experience, one of my former colleagues was checking his inbox very late and we were always waiting for his response. To explain more, you can compare the efficiency of virtual classes during covid-19 pandemics with real classes that were held before. It is harder for both teachers and students to teach and learn in this way since the communication is not effective and more boring. Also, there isn't a good space to ask and answer the raised questions. Similarly, working in separate places with e-mail contacts has the same lower efficiency.
In conclusion, during a project, if workers have the chance to communicate in person, their results will be more accurate and take less time because the risk of misunderstanding and wasting time is lower. I, personally prefer to work with my colleagues in one place instead of sending messages and waiting for answers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lleagues asked me by e-mail to fill out the excel sheets of daily data that he previously...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...t he previously created himself. But, I didnt get the meaning correctly and begin to ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 708, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... my concern about the hard work needed. Therefore he would explain the request clearly. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 901, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... effective and more boring. Also, there isnt a good space to ask and answer the rais...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, similarly, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98831775701 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85007178963 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572429906542 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6836815876 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8260869565 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6086956522 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21616854804 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527222783251 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452498090394 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134205426706 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440424874579 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.