Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to the topic of how students should work in school, it attracts a lot of attentions. There is an increasing debate on whether students should work in groups or work alone in recent years. Some people believe that students must work together for their school assignments while some people do not agree and hold different opinions. From my point of view, I support the idea that students should work in groups in school and I will develop my idea in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, working in groups can sharpen students' communication ability and improve their interpersonal skills. When students work together, to complete a task, they have to talk and collaborate. Through these process, they learn how to effectively express their thoughts and understand how to co-work. Drawing from my own experience, I was very shy when I was in middle school. However, my teacher requested us to complete assignments with teammates. By working together with my classmates, I started to gain proficiency on communication and did not afraid of speaking in front of public. In addition, I also got used to collaborate with different kinds of people. I have learned a lot through the group projects and I believe that the experience is invaluable. For this reason, I think that students must work in groups.
Secondly, students can brainstorm and create better ideas when they do projects together. Sometimes people may have difficulties to figure out certain points and they would struggle for some times. When students work in groups, they can exchange and discuss ideas to complete assignments. Take myself as example, I had a computer science project that was open to work with classmates. In the beginning, I decided to work alone as I were confident that I could make it. But soon, I struggled at a certain process and could not understand the reason. As the deadline is approaching, I decided tot work with a classmate. He soon pointed out a point I did not consider before and we brainstormed an effective approach to complete the assignment. In the end, our project got a high grade. We could not make it if we chose to work alone. Therefore, working together is a better choice.
While some people think that students may have fun together if they work in groups. Yet, taking some rests to relax during works is acceptable. Moreover, cultivating the ability to work and communicate with others is very critical in the real world. As a result, I believe working together is better than working alone.
In light of the reasons above, I firmly reckon that working together can help students to learn more effectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 70
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 80
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 70
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 85
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, working together is a better choice. While some people think that students ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, i think, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93049327354 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79655741491 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482062780269 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8370251988 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8275862069 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3793103448 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62068965517 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421233583748 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116816950747 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621741856718 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252267250929 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359023219319 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.