Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to the issue that people today are less happy than the people in the past because of the rapid development, some people may agree with this idea and give us sound reasons for their beliefs. On the other hand, some other people might disagree and have different opinion. Also, those opponents could provide us with strong purposes to support their thoughts. I believe that the rapid development in the technology made people less happy and less satisfied that the people lived in the past because there are so many reasons support thought. This short essay will demonstrate some points regarding my point of view in the following paragraph:
First of all, in my opinion, it is widely understood that the rapid change in world makes people less happy. People today have to work for many hours each day in order to enough money for their families. So, each worker has less time to enjoy himself. Additionally, the long working days make the people very exhausted. Eventually, the people prefer to spend their rest time instead of hanging out and enjoying themselves. However, people in the past had more time for themselves to do what they like and that made them happy and more comfort than the people in our days.
Another point why I advocate that the people in the past were more satisfied that the people today. The rapid development in the technology makes our life easier but in turn the people need more money to follow the technology. So, the simple things that made the people whom lived in the past happy are priceless now. Moreover, the people today wish to buy many things and that make them have many problems and troubles to think about.
Finally, it is a well-established fact the rapid development in the technology has negative impact on our relations. The people today depend on the internet and social media to communicate with each other and that reduce the meeting and the face to face conversations. Eventually, that effect on the relation between the friends and the family members. On the other hand, the people in the past did their best to meet each other in order to spend nice together.
Finally, from what has been discussed above, we may draw a conclusion which says that, people who hold opposite idea may have the right to believe in that, but my opinion, and other people opinions are overwhelmingly too much to be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 39
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79368932039 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41717718553 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473300970874 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2262376505 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.947368421 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345141574391 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109325334568 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088595547614 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18260723213 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114056746865 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.