Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
The world we live in is changing faster than in the past. It is very important for the quality of peoples’ lives that what exactly the situation of our surrounding world is. In my point of view, the people who live in this world are less happy and satisfied with their lives for the two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, in today’s changing world, peoples’ lives are less enjoyable than in the past. In this altering world, electronic companies are developing more devices than in the past. Despite this evolution in technology makes life easier for people, but people tend to spend more of their time with these devices rather than to make contact with each other, so they always feel lonely. In this mechanical life, kids prefer to play with their fancy gadgets than play old games with their friends. For instance, my uncle’s family has six members, but they always have their own lives with their digital devices. Additionally, they do not talk much to each other as a family and whenever I go to their home I cannot see the spirits of a happy family in their place.
Furthermore, more changing in the world make people have less happy or satisfied lives. In this situation, people, especially experts, have to be up to date in their majors to be successful in their careers. Although it is hard for elders to deal with changing than youngsters. My own experience as a civil engineer demonstrates evidence of this situation. In my major, we are more relying on computer software for our modelings and calculations. Because the software usually has errors, software developers often release an update or introduce new software to cope with these problems. Moreover, it is hard for my elder colleagues to adapt to this change. Consequently, they have to spend a lot of money to take courses and spend their valuable time to attend classes to learn these modifications.
In conclusion, I think in this modern and fast-changing world, people have less joyfulness and less satisfaction in their routine lives. Not only spend people more of their time in the artificial world but also they have to always learn new things with this rate of change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a p 66
- TPO 30 66
- tpo 31 73
- TPO 31 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68405246263 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489417989418 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6261338966 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7368421053 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387308156035 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134407364883 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10538548378 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27357840455 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749606732371 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.