Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Competitions among friends will negatively affect their friendships
Humankind is a type of social animals who needs to interact with others. People's relationships are the most important issue in their lives and people take care about their bonds. One of the prominent relationship is friendship which is sometimes more respectful than family relations. A question can be raised in this regard is that whether competitions between friends impair this bond or not. One reoccurring standpoint states rivalry has negative impacts on friendship. I repudiate this idea and in the ensuing lines, I will delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
The first reason is that competitions are not necessarily lead to negative ramifications. If two people compete fairly, there are no reasons for peers to be mad at each other and influenced adversely. In the completion, parties try to enhance their ability to get their desired results. Hence, even if friends lose to each other they can handle this conflict and know there is nothing wrong with their friends. Furthermore, competitions may strength the friendship. For example, when we were at high school and prepared ourselves for universities' entrance exam, although we were in the competition as the universities' capacity is limited, we truly help each other to get a higher rank. Therefore, the competition provide us an opportunity to augment our attachments.
Secondly, real friendship is not affected by unrelated issues. People make friend because of their needs and this friendship is based on some valuable criteria such as honesty, integrity, and kindness. Until these values don't change, nothing can hurt the friendship. With this in mind, competitions regardless of their result could not degrade friends' bond. Take, for instance, when I was in high school, we played football at break times. The results indicate which team has the right to play the next day, so plays were important. In the middle of some matches we disputed with each other and sometimes had a physical fights. But, we all knew that what happened in the playground had no matters with our friendship and it really worked as we are still close friend.
All aforementioned reasons bring us to conclude that competitions and friendship have not a mutual negative effect on each other as competition is a fair process and friendship's foundation is based on different values.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing sports can teach people lessons about life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor. 76
- TPO-45 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. U 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two reasons to substantiate my point. The first reason is that competitions ar...
^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...hough we were in the competition as the universities capacity is limited, we truly help each...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...grity, and kindness. Until these values dont change, nothing can hurt the friendship...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17105263158 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90106843438 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586842105263 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9712859343 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3181818182 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244918485424 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730827274201 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496366978274 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155115258841 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143689101354 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.