It is universally accepted that some famous athletes receive astronomical salaries and are among the wealthiest people in the world. This issue triggers a controversial argument whether it is justice for giving this huge amount of money for a person just for playing football or basketball. The public attitude toward this matter is divided into two parts. Some people advocate athletes, whereas others take the opposite point of view. The following essay takes an elaborating look at both opinions to reach a logical conclusion.
It goes without saying that, being a professional athlete is not a simple work and requires arduous endeavor. Considering this in mind, supporting athletes seems rational; because there is a handful of such persons which bear the extraordinary capability to reach this level and can exhibit pure skills. Moreover, these individuals become retired sooner, so they should have a safe financial resource to guarantee their future and without stress could focus on their practices. Besides these factors, these outstanding people are idols of every society that public heart beat for them and mutually the athletes do their best to glorify the reputation of their nation as well as bring prestige and credit. Indeed, the celebrities are the treasure of a nation which could be effective in poverty alleviation, sexual equality, spreading knowledge and combating drug trafficking through implementing athletic culture. Furthermore, sportsmen tolerate the hard practice, experience lots of stress, have less leisure time and above all they spend a long time far from family.
Conversely, the second group has its own reasons and repudiates the aforementioned arguments. From their perspective, the rate of some athletes yearly income is more than thousands of time higher than a professor with a great H-index. A research done on the Sydney University shows that a mid-level NBA player has revenue equal with 20 expert physicians. They believe that it is far from the nature of sport and athletic moral and it turns to a kind of business which impose a negative effect on the public mind. Based on their consideration, athletes rather than being an idol or national pride are a kind of businessman which obsessed with financial temptation. Indeed, their positive and symbolic characters turned to the destructive impression.
To wrap it up, according to the aforesaid materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that, professional athletes deserve to have staggering earning to some normal point. In return, sportsmen should promise themselves not to sacrifice their nation's interest to their own interest.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Younger school student children (age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math science, history, and language. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than having profound knowledge about this job. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nations interest to their own interest.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3768115942 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8687436811 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2568679428 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.157894737 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0922216897422 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240809783504 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0171676036209 0.0737576698707 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497591875881 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00733691280261 0.0645574589148 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.