Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this busy life of the current world, weekend is the one thing that everyone looks forward to arrive every week. I think, everyone like me, has their own plans sketched up for the weekend. In this statement it is posited that jobs with working long hours but for only three days a week are more enjoyable than jobs with five worksdays and shorter hours. I agree with this statement and I will discuss the reasons behind my opinion in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, a week with four off days is an opportunity to get enough rest and attend to the needs of the personal life. One might argue that working for long hours will reduce the benefits of having four off days as a person will be very stressed due to the longer working hours. But, one should consider other factors involved. If a person works at a distant place, then he has to commute a longer distance everyday for five days a week. This commute has its own taxing on the person even if the workings hours are short. Moreover, resting for one day is enough to recover form the stress of working long hours. For instance, my own experience is a compelling reason. Currently I work as an engineer in a reknowned company where I have five workdays. There are days when I don't have any work but still have to come to the office which is a two hours drive from my home. If I were allowed to work a little extra time, I could have finished the works in three days or may be even in shorter time. Thus, I could have done the same amount of work but in fewer days and could have saved myself from the long journey to office. This would have enabled me with enough time to brush up my guitar skill.
Furthermore, when there are fewer days to works, people tends to be more attentive and dilligent in their work. There is little scope for procrastination then and the employees will become more efficient. It can be beneficial for both the company and the employee. In Europe, a poll conducted among the office workers showed that they will prefer working for longer hours and fewer days over few hours and more days. Their reasoning was that it would freed their time which they could have used for their family. My father, who was a goverment employee, had an standard five days a week job. He remained busy with his work and took the first day of the weekend for resting. My mother always complained that he never got enough time from my father during the weeks, and to that my father also agrees. This is another strong reason for me.
In the conclusion, with the discussion and reasons stated above, to strike a balance between a work life and having a personal life, working longer hours for three days is more practical and enjoyable to me over the working five days a week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 73
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to arriving'.
Suggestion: to arriving
...e one thing that everyone looks forward to arrive every week. I think, everyone like me, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...hen he has to commute a longer distance everyday for five days a week. This commute has ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve five workdays. There are days when I dont have any work but still have to come to...
^^^^
Line 9, column 452, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'free'
Suggestion: free
...days. Their reasoning was that it would freed their time which they could have used f...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 559, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ther, who was a goverment employee, had an standard five days a week job. He remai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, as to, for instance, i think, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45454545455 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22684744354 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462450592885 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1309595367 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6923076923 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445149185078 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131300321608 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103471741516 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313372047816 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453949997873 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.