Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It does not conceal that job satisfaction has a pivotal role in individual life, as we spend a lot of time on a specific job field. Besides, a comfortable job field and place provide people more satisfactory life with the desired goal. However, some people think that three days work with a long working hour is more enjoyable than five days with shorter time. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is really overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I cogently prefer shorter time with five days of work. For holding this aspect I will elaborate on several reasons which I provide followings.
First and foremost, usually people are energetic during the day times of several hours and after that their body exhausted automatically. Various research showed that during this period which is 8-hours people can concentrate properly and the outcome of the performance is well. But, after beyond those hours, their body feel tiredness and cannot concentrate proper. Moreover, if they try to work actively more they possibly feel dizziness and difficult to achieve proper result. Thus, three days with long working hours actually affects human in physically, mentally week and also work pressure is stressful. But, work with shorter time people feel stressless and out of pressure easy to concentrate. For instance, I am a studious student and study regularly because I cannot perform well with lots pressure. But, before 15 days of my exam I fall sick and I was not able to study well. As a result, before the night of the exam I studied so much and I feel so stressed that during the exam I failed to remember some of the theory though I knew that theories. This is happened because of the stress of the previous night.
Furthermore, five days work with 2-days weekend people can get enough time for resting and also spend time with family and friends. But, with 3-days work people has lots of time for resting and I think they experience boredom. Moreover, to handle three days of work pressure they also need time to get energetic which is not required for 5-days. For particular, I worked for a company three years ago and experienced the 3-days work pressure which was really difficult for me to handle. Moreover, after 3-days I had nothing to do. I travelled, reading books watched the movie but still felt lonely. Overall I feel that the whole weekend was futile.
To recapitulate, the job place will enjoyable when people perform better with the desired outcome. But, in longer hours people experience so pressure that they cannot perform properly. With fewer work hours and more days people have less pressure and they can accomplish the task very well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The fact that technology is outpacing the needs of those in cultures that can afford the technologycreates cultures of excess consumerism. 16
- tpo 25In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod 71
- Tpo 49Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the 73
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1013, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...at during the exam I failed to remember some of the theory though I knew that theories. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, thus, well, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95143487859 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55919686038 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483443708609 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3889237452 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2692307692 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4230769231 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302124370382 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892290454597 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831975570182 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201213603742 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058064425384 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.