Governments have the option to spend the money of tax payers on different projects. Some may prioritize spending the money on enhancing the internet infrastructure services, however, some others would consider improving the public transportation system. Although both of those projects are important, I feel more inclined for the later option for various reasons
To start with, spending money on public transportation allows people to save time. Many people are reluctant to use public transportation because they fear that they might arrive late to their work place.. Spending more money on public transportation would allow more frequent shuttle service, expansion of network coverage, and more comfortable cabins for passengers. Thus passengers would not only arrive on time to their offices, but also the ride would be more comfortable. For example, I drive to work often Because my bus does not depart on time. If there are better transportation services, then I would definitely consider using the public transportation.
In addition, allocating more budget to enhance public transportation services creates a cleaner environment. The emission of carbon dioxide released from car engines pollute the air. For example, in china the pollution level of air is far above the standard limits. Surprisingly, It is estimated according to environmentalists that air quality index reaches up to 200 which is considered the worst in the world. If plans are in place to improve public transportation system, It is estimated that the air quality index would improve by at least thirty points. Therefore, confidently saying, a better public transportation system means a better air quality and healthier people.
Finally, There are private investors in the internet services which can help the government to build good internet infrastructure services. For example, companies like Venison , T-mobile, and Netflix are private companies that are willing to spend lots of money on building a good internet network. However, public transportation is more of a government responsibility. Moreover, public transportation fees has to be affordable inorder to allow rich and poor people to use it.
To sum up, spending more money on public transportation is a priority for the governments. A good public transportation system reduces car usage and creates cleaner air. Furthermore, it reduces pollution and supports people health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ey might arrive late to their work place.. Spending more money on public transport...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...more comfortable cabins for passengers. Thus passengers would not only arrive on tim...
^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: often work
...re comfortable. For example, I drive to work often Because my bus does not depart on time....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ces. For example, companies like Venison , T-mobile, and Netflix are private compa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, at least, for example, i feel, in addition, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56216216216 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19566077738 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7636935168 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256364491657 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822232321777 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669698559792 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15744267017 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434758769886 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.