Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? People who do many things at a time do few things better. Use specific examples to support your arguments.
There is a saying that goes "It's not by how far but how well" this saying is very practical in the world today. I agree with the notion that being preoccupied with varieties of task can make people do less in some certain aspects than others. I feel this way for two reasons, which would be explored in the following essay.
To start with, engaging in a lot of stuffs at the same time would give one less time to sufficiently do succeed in a particular aspect. In other words, we tend to put in most of our energy in the task that strikes us the most, which makes us do other stuffs hurriedly and without adequate thoughts and focus. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this, during my final year, I had to take in lot of tasking jobs such as my undergrad projects, being the head of class, dealing with church programs, and also having time for friends. It was quite hard merging all of this into my schedule which was mostly filled with lectures and classes. I had more affinity for my undergrad projects due to the friendly supervisor I had, this made me spend less time on other areas. I couldn't keep up with church programs, nor have time for friends; which made me lose some friendships, and I got the head of class title taken from me. Based on this experience, I can confidently concur that sticking to a particular course is way preferable.
Moreover, good health would give a great state of mind and ensure clarity. Combining lot of stuffs can make one restless and get tired easily. Thereby causing health issues which would deprive one of the times to fully focus and finish the intended mixed plans. For instance, while I was preparing for my GRE, I tried to incorporate my data analytical course, and driving school all in my schedule and at the same time. I noticed I got burnout almost every day; I wake up mostly with a sworn-out eyes, swollen face, looking so shabbily. At the long run, I had to be admitted in a hospital where I spent about 2 weeks treating an illness that stemmed up from my lack of rest and sleep. This particular scenario had a troll on my GRE result, making me have a lesser score than I had hoped for. Based on this experience, I can tell how extremely important and underrated good health might be; which is very essential in achieving a greater result at the end.
In conclusion, it is advisable and preferable to focus on just a particular stuff, get better at it before moving to the next. This is because, one would be biased in allocating time for each aspect, and might focus on the one they love the most. Also, being hooked up with lots of stuff can cause health issues which would affect the intended result.
- Turtle Excluder Device uses in combating the threats to endangered sea turtles 70
- Supporting and opposing theories on the usefulness of the buildings in Chaco Canyon 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements People who do many things at a time do few things better Use specific examples to support your arguments 80
- toefl integrated writing 3
- The first step to self knowlege is by rejecting the familiar 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...de me spend less time on other areas. I couldnt keep up with church programs, nor have ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49795918367 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4637513681 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9554490626 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.952380952 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107841553791 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354899533902 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463886981833 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749116685743 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305363615689 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...de me spend less time on other areas. I couldnt keep up with church programs, nor have ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49795918367 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4637513681 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9554490626 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.952380952 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107841553791 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354899533902 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463886981833 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749116685743 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305363615689 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.