Turtle Excluder Device uses in combating the threats to endangered sea turtles
According to the reading and lecture, commercial shrimp-fishing boats are menacing to the already endangered sea turtle species, and the use of turtle excluder device has been considered useful and efficient by some researchers. The article provides three theories to disprove the effectiveness of the turtle excluder device. However, the lecturer states three studies claiming the method is efficient, counteracting the theories of the author. Her position is that they the theories do not hold water.
Firstly, the author of the article emphasize that the use of this device would cost the shrimpers some catch. The author notes that the device turtle passage made it easy for some of the shrimp to escape. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that there are about thousands of shrimp boats operating, altogether catching thousands of turtles. She additionally points out that the shrimp population should be compared to the turtle population and not just relying on individual size.
Furthermore, the author points out that there are more efficient methods. She propounds the shortening of time limit that shrimp boats are allowed to strike their nets underwater, as this method would allow the turtles that has been caught to breath in air and also allow their release. The lecturer, however, disputes this notion. She contends that it is not practical enough, as this time limit would be impossible to enact. it is not easy to monitor thousands of boats but the TED device can be easily checked, says the lecturer.
Finally, the authors posit that the device doesn't give an efficient result for larger species such as loggerhead and leatherback. Further stating that they are quite big to escape through the established escape opening. The lecturer asserts that, although the openings are quite small, a larger opening can be made in the device for areas where this type would be utilized. Consequently, solving the problem of inefficiency of the larger species passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | Leez | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-07 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | tessahaha | 81 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | hind aljubori | 73 | view |
- Turtle Excluder Device uses in combating the threats to endangered sea turtles 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements People who do many things at a time do few things better Use specific examples to support your arguments 80
- toefl integrated writing 3
- Supporting and opposing theories on the usefulness of the buildings in Chaco Canyon 61
- The first step to self knowlege is by rejecting the familiar 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... device turtle passage made it easy for some of the shrimp to escape. this specific argumen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... easy for some of the shrimp to escape. this specific argument is challenged by the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ime limit would be impossible to enact. it is not easy to monitor thousands of boa...
^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ally, the authors posit that the device doesnt give an efficient result for larger spe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ies such as loggerhead and leatherback. Further stating that they are quite big to esca...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68317409938 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515527950311 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9006494969 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22945350615 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630991583112 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105153541755 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143919858451 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118876448731 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.