Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that everyday people work so hard and with a very high rate in order to align with the modern high-speed world. Surely, within this busy days and crowdy world, people lost a lot of valuable things and its direct damage to the quality of life in human societies. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that in the twenty-century, development in technology rescued people from famine, illness and poverty, all of these remarkable developments were not possible without this high rate work. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that because people are busy doing many different things, they do very few things well.
First and foremost, weakness in the relationship between members of the family. Today both parents work out of home and families have very few time for meeting one another and conversation. It is very rare that families have a meal together at one table. Children do not see their parents a lot and it creates a lot of psychological harm to them. The statistical estimates show that the amount of the teenage criminal activities is higher in families with a lack in the good relationship between members of them.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that busy day's fallen people healthy in trouble. The high rate of life in big cities pushes people forward to more and more using easy and fast transportation. People do not spend enough time on sport and other physical activities and they mainly used fast foods with high calory and less nutritional value. Even most people have not enough time to visit with their friends and fun. The collection of these elements putting up people healthy at high risk. The problems like heart ill, fat and depression.
Finally, yet importantly, the future of human societies present in threatened. In the past revolution in manufacture and technology change people world and provide wealth and happiness for people. But in recent years, it seems that people are flooding themselves in this new world. It is clear if people continue in this way the human life move toward annihilation. Because young people are very unwilling to marriage and give children because they find it's like a dam to their success. It is clear that families are the basic unit of society and without it, the societies would be collapsed.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that because people are busy doing so many different things not only they do very few things well but also destroy many valuable things like family and health and ethics.
- Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. 90
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cellphone, online games and social networking websites. 73
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO INTEGRATED ELEPHANTS BEHAVIORS 51 66
- TPO 45 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se who argue that in the twenty-century, development in technology rescued people...
^^
Line 1, column 636, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...idea that because people are busy doing many different things, they do very few things well. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...work out of home and families have very few time for meeting one another and conversatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...d that because people are busy doing so many different things not only they do very few things...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, well, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9185520362 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57177629115 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5638206159 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8181818182 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316167922456 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824534692909 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132976294854 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194156928097 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136825276638 0.0645574589148 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.