It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, the swift and monumental scientific and technological achievements is changed our attitude toward life and surrounding. Previously, people just had information about their village or town and that was enough for them. Whereas, nowadays thanks to communicational devices we can get aware what happens in every corner of world. In fact, the people now are more curious, especially about policies statesmen taking. The following essay takes an elaborating look at possible reasons for inclination of people, in particular students, to politics.
There is no denying that, our universe is made up of interconnected countries with common economical, cultural and political profits. Hence, any activities in even remote point of world with dispassionate targets can ensue global effects. For instance, the recent sanctions over Iran, as an Opec member and a chief producers of oil and gas, has triggered sudden and strict effect on oil price increment. Subsequently, as everything all over the world depends and assess with the price of oil, imposed sanction directly covers other sections and countries. other noteworthy issue that aflame students interest to politics is the emergence of social media and mass media like TV, Facebook and Instagram. Through surfing on these networks the unconsciously attracts with the hot news about controversy between two political leader. Finally, they become obsessed with following the rest of story and then they get addicted to policy.
In addition, apart from international attributing news the students are directly in touch with their own government. Students as a human resources and treasures of each nation have responsibility to be conscious about the destiny of their country. Assuredly, their awareness causes the statesmen not pursue their own profits and put the public interest prior to personal benefits. A group of sociologists carried out an investigation, at ANU University, to find the major stimulus in captivating by policy in students. They announced that the society now is more sensitive to any interactions and their job opportunity involved with the political decisions. Moreover, based on their results, the number graduated students in the field of policy increased by 14 percent over past 10 years.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that his volume of interactions among countries as well as among rulers and people was unprecedented. Thus the tendency to understand policy was meaningless.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To remain happy and optimistic when you fail is more important than achieving success 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
- Do you agree or disagree：the best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase teachers’salary. 80
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better? 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Younger school student children (age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math science, history, and language. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e or town and that was enough for them. Whereas, nowadays thanks to communicational dev...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'producer'?
Suggestion: producer
...ver Iran, as an Opec member and a chief producers of oil and gas, has triggered sudden an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ly covers other sections and countries. other noteworthy issue that aflame students i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 822, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'leader' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'leaders'.
Suggestion: leaders
...about controversy between two political leader. Finally, they become obsessed with fol...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 790, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased by 14 percent over past 10 years. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 197, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ng rulers and people was unprecedented. Thus the tendency to understand policy was m...
^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to understand policy was meaningless.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, look, moreover, so, then, thus, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, in addition, in fact, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47115384615 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06906674301 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6632651043 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.380952381 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8095238095 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153844353074 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413564084484 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508565523111 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074421211058 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529846571007 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.