Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is no secret that teachers have always been appreciated, due to both their beneficial impacts on the growth of children and their effect on enhancing the level of awareness in the societies. In this regard, some people believe that despite the importance of teachers for the community, they are not valued by the individuals the same as the past. I personally do agree with this idea, due to a couple of reasons, two of which are decreasing the dependency of students to schools and teachers and consideration to practical skills, which have been elaborated hereunder.
First and foremost, in the past decade, various methods of teaching have been created in which students can learn what they want independent of the teachers. These methods not only can play a role the same as the teacher's roles in the process of education but also can provide the students with a higher level of learning. As an example, we can talk about the Internet. The Internet has a huge number of applications. We all refer to the Internet to find solutions to our questions. Nowadays, there are a lot of educational materials on the Internet, including movies and games that could be used as sources for learning what we need. Hence, the dependency on teachers for learning different courses has diminished in comparison to the past. As a result, the teachers have lost their importance between at least a group of people in each society.
Moreover, in today's world, practical skills have found their way through the societies. All countries in the world, regardless of the level of their development, need people with practical abilities, able to solve complicated problems that the country will face. These skills are not something that could be acquired by taking courses at school and listening to what the teachers say; They mostly could be obtained by experiencing the work or taking part in programs such as internships and not sitting in the classrooms in university or college. For example, no one can become an excellent mechanical engineer by just reading about the laws of thermodynamics. He/she should go and touch a turbine and understand what is happening in it. Therefore, individuals have become aware of the importance of practical skills, and they do not find themselves dependent on teachers and their knowledge like before. It is another reason why teachers are not appreciated the same as the past years.
To sum up, regarding the aforementioned reasons, I vehemently not only agree with the idea that teachers are not welcomed by societies as before but also believe that we are not dependent on them anymore.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Universities should spend more money on facilities (such as computer labs and technology in general) rather than on hiring some famous professors. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 76
- TPO 38 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, at least, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00913242009 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84144963592 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490867579909 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2146672413 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.473684211 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136649998504 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427717833339 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448134204256 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908662517594 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161849434013 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.