Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Content discussed in classes is planned beforehand, however teachers may, sometimes, bring about topics that are not in the educational program. There are times when an educator indulges himself in a social, or political conversation with his students, and expresses his beliefs. In my opinion, such situations should not only be avoided, but restricted as well. I feel this way for the reasons that I will explore in this essay.

To start with, social, or political views can easily be implemented into students’ mind, especially when they are being referred to during a class. This may happen because of students’ tendency to take a teacher’s word for a fact. Teachers, on the other hand, are expected to teach their students academic material, without taking a stance on the case being studied. If they don’t do so, they are falling in contradiction with the rules, and principles built in the educational system, they accepted to follow. Furthermore, students have the right to have their own opinion, and be free of unwanted influence. On the whole, teachers should not make their social, or political opinion known to students due to possible chance of implementing biased ideas.

In addition, another reason why teachers should not state their personal views is because students may get offended. The consequences of this can include the students’ declination in academic level. The nature of these topics requires you to choose a side, and if a teacher’s doesn’t match their students’, conflict may arise. In such a case, the more vulnerable side- students may believe that the teacher is expressing his opinion out loud to degrade or ridicule the former’s opinion. In conclusion, students can take teacher’s personal statements close to heart and choose to fall back on their studies.

Therefore, because of the chances of influencing undesired ideas, and offending students, I’m against teachers letting students know of their personal views.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-27 Shiimaaa 76 view
2020-01-23 supergirl20 60 view
2020-01-12 naziii 70 view
2020-01-01 sahar yarahmadi 70 view
2019-12-14 shrijan 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Diella :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns that I will explore in this essay. To start with, social, or political view...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chance of implementing biased ideas. In addition, another reason why teachers...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...choose to fall back on their studies. Therefore, because of the chances of inf...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the whole, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42356687898 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07153181325 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6684149181 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245217993383 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854115773175 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611473579643 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139873879037 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561585794328 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.