Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society
in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer.
Without a shadow of doubt, teachers have an indispensable role in nurturing student who will be responsible for country’s arrangement. The more teachers concentrate on their valuable work, the more a society will burgeon. To have a maximum efficacy, teachers should be satisfied commercially, and they should be respected. An ineluctable query question which always has been the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is whether teachers’ work are more appreciated in our era or in the past. I personally contend that nowadays teacher are more respected in comparison to past, and many facilities have been provided for them. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently delve into my paramount reasons to justify my viewpoint.
The first aspect to point out is that nowadays teachers are paid more in comparison to the past. Not having a suitable amount of income, teachers are not able to concentrate on preparing nurtured students who build the country. In past, teachers used to have work in an alternative job to be financially satisfied; accordingly, teachers were not able to obviate the needs of students such as their scientific problems or their emotional issues due to the lack of concentration. On the other hand, today teachers earn one of the highest salaries in developed countries enabling them to handle their own life easily. Had governments not altered their viewpoint about teachers’ income, modern society would have been faced such a harsh issues that could have brought about crises.
The second reason I would like to mention is that the demand for being teacher has dramatically increased. A great deal of students look up to their teachers, and they consider themselves as future teachers. In addition, in developing societies, which girls were not permitted going to schools hitherto, the girls are more likely to choose their future job teaching in rural areas they are living there. Moreover, the growth of rural industries raise the need for trained teachers who nurture work forces for industries. For instance, in Iran due to the increment in cultivating arid lands, numerous persons should be hired from rural people; hence, the immediate need for teachers in this societies has raised the respect for teachers.
To sum up, no one can refute that teachers play a salient role in nurturing educated work forces who constitute the organization helping the country’s economy. I personally believe that today teachers are more respected in comparison to teachers in past. Their salary have increased helping them concentrate on their job. In addition growth of rural areas industry has made people in those areas accept that teacher’s role in society’s boon is outstanding. Therefore, governments should specify an appropriate budget to ministry of teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | pedram1994 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by societyin the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support youranswer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...urtured students who build the country. In past, teachers used to have work in an alter...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...iety would have been faced such a harsh issues that could have brought about crises. ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 686, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nce, the immediate need for teachers in this societies has raised the respect for te...
^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ore respected in comparison to teachers in past. Their salary have increased helping th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...lping them concentrate on their job. In addition growth of rural areas industry has made...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... their job. In addition growth of rural areas industry has made people in those areas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32739420935 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96918464566 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518930957684 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.511793545 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.904761905 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143977998682 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530852172896 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401786514073 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977000044216 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314515851259 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.