Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
The 20th and 21st centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes they made in humans' lives. In the distinctive civilized societies, one of the most perplexing questions among individuals is that whether to travel by getting help from a tour leader or travel independently. A plethora of people is in the conviction that traveling within a group led by a tour leader is the best way of traveling especially for traveling abroad, while others take a radically diverse point of view. Although both attitudes have their own merits and drawbacks, my viewpoint is that in most cases it is better to travel within a group. The ensuing explanations will further elaborate on my perspective.
First and foremost, when traveling overseas, more often than not, one does not know the language of the country, so having a tour leader is advantageous for communicating with the local people. Most of the times, tourists would like to communicate with local people and get familiar with their culture better than they already knew. In this case, having a tour leader, especially a local one, would assist so much. As a case in point, I used to be a tour leader, back in my college days, and from my personal experience, I can say that most of the tourists would like to talk, communicate, and share their thoughts and sentiments about Iran with Iranian people.
In addition, one might get lost. As a matter of fact, if one did not know the language of a country, there is a greater possibility for him/her to get lost. To illustrate, I personally met a German family that had been lost, while visiting Iran, my country. In fact, they could not speak Persian and nobody could understand them because they were speaking English. Luckily, I came across them and helped them to find their destiny.
Apart from the points that I have made above in favor of traveling within a group, there is a reason that why it is better to travel on your own, not with a group of people, which deserves some words here. That is when traveling independently, there is no need to conform to the schedule of the trip. Whenever one becomes a part of a whole, not only does he/she have to conform to the group's decision but also he/she has to obey the program schedule of the group. In contrast, when one travels on one’s own, he/ she can comfortably change his/her schedule.
By way of conclusion, on the grounds of the aforementioned arguments, I fundamentally agree that traveling within a group has more advantages than traveling on one's own does due to the fact that one can avoid getting lost, and communicate better with local people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 76
- Online encyclopedia vs traditional versions of them 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for the students to learn concepts and ideas than it is for them to learn facts. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...a part of a whole, not only does he/she have to conform to the groups decision but a...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n comfortably change his/her schedule. By way of conclusion, on the grounds of ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'apart from', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.190661478599 0.229887763892 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.163424124514 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.068093385214 0.0866891130778 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0622568093385 0.046263068375 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0505836575875 0.0685040099705 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143968871595 0.118717715034 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0466926070039 0.0351676179071 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73354713372 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0291828793774 0.0309702414327 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0933852140078 0.0887237588012 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0194552529183 0.0209618222197 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155642023346 0.0139019557991 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2628.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 456.0 408.028673835 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76315789474 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31798245614 0.338922669872 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225877192982 0.251872472559 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162280701754 0.174417080927 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.114035087719 0.112833075102 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73354713372 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524397521467 95% => OK
Word variations: 57.0858423882 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9026420929 48.84282405 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.315789474 120.699889404 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.5533526081 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.5877192982 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.38028169014 1.45489161554 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349411392214 0.300154397459 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132741084804 0.103427244359 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0794098097911 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525761625147 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173409216645 0.151897553556 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129966358553 0.114077575197 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807720198708 0.0781384742642 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.307744249114 0.336927656856 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0711147619691 0.067059652881 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224154934958 0.210909579961 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093133611249 0.0618886996521 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.