Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more
effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Nowadays, it should be obvious that learning materials in school is a considerable importance in one’s future. There are different methods to increase the efficiency of learning in schools, but it is not fairly straightforward which one would have a greater impact on efficiency. Some people believe that they can studying alone is better to learn lessons since they can concentrate easily and would not distract by others. On the other hand, others think that students help each other in group activities to learn lessons. I, personally, hold the latter opinion. I believe that group activities bolster one’s self-confidence and motivation for learning. In what follows, I will pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my standpoint in this subject.
The first reason why group assignments are highly beneficial for learning is rooted in the fact that students have discussions with each other in group. It seems that group activity persuades students to express their knowledge about the subject. That is to say, every group member explains his/her point of view about the subject. In other words, they exchange ideas with each other and make a brainstorm, which have a profound impact on increasing the quality of the assignment. As a result, students can broad their horizon in that subject and learn many invaluable things about it.
The other point to corroborate my stance is that students can ask their questions in group. It is undeniable that usually, if not most of the time, there are some questions that students can not answer them by their own or it take a long time to solve it. By being in a group, other students can help to solve the question. Therefore students can learn more efficiently in less time. Moreover, I should mention that not only do students learn more efficiently, but also they learn to have responsibilities. Each member of the group has a specific task in the group. They cannot postpone their works while other members count on them. This is another focal advantages of group study that people should draw attention to.
All aforementioned reasons point to my idea. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counter examples might exist. As a result, I suggest conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'study'
Suggestion: study
...ency. Some people believe that they can studying alone is better to learn lessons since ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
... can not answer them by their own or it take a long time to solve it. By being in a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tudents can help to solve the question. Therefore students can learn more efficiently in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as a result, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80003049308 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512755102041 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0739311445 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6086956522 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156553550086 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480032570511 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444230930148 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921794078978 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497918375303 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.