Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
That most influential figures who are deciding in most of the significant careers are not young people cannot be ignored; nonetheless, the point should not be forgotten is the fact that the process resulting in what decision has been made is not a process based on the decision of an individual. Today's technological advancements have transformed the nature of the mentioned process. Due to this, every single one working with them is effectual to even some seemingly unimportant issues. Thus, since the most users of these sophisticated technological applications are the youth, not only do they affect this process, but their commitments recognize the result of decisions today. This essay will elaborate upon this claim to show why young people do have influences on the important decisions.
First, it is extremely worth to consider that the nature of the decision-making procedure is not anymore a hidden event happening behind closed doors. Thanks to journalists twitting every second, people, young in particular, are informed of all events of a community, important or unimportant. They not only can get information, but they can effectively commit to inform others as well. The networks such as twitters, facebook, and to name by a few let their users share news and events, so it means that one simple sentence can be read million times. Take for example, all circumstances happened during Arabic Spring. In less than one year, some of the strong dictatorships were fallen as a result of retwitting of quite a few young people.
The second factor should be mentioned is the fact that the young people are more informative. Today, the number of educated people, most of them are young, is much more than three or four decades ago, which has caused they become expert in a great number of issues. Fifty years ago, hardly can an educated engineer who has some profound ideas about the political problems be found. Nowadays, the young access to a broad spectrum of knowledge permitting them to influentially act in sensitive moments. Therefore, their actions are more exact than their parents' actions, and so they are effectuated as well.
In conclusion, by considering the fact that the meaning of being active and decisive in social events has been changed in the today's terminology, it is perceivable why the youth's action, despite its totally different face, is both influential and historical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun let seems to be countable; consider using: 'few lets'.
Suggestion: few lets
...as twitters, facebook, and to name by a few let their users share news and events, so i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ns that one simple sentence can be read million times. Take for example, all circumstan...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...g Arabic Spring. In less than one year, some of the strong dictatorships were fallen as a r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...n social events has been changed in the todays terminology, it is perceivable why the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
... terminology, it is perceivable why the youths action, despite its totally different f...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'even so', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in particular', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197278911565 0.229887763892 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.15873015873 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.1179138322 0.0866891130778 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0725623582766 0.046263068375 157% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0362811791383 0.0685040099705 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0544217687075 0.0351676179071 155% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87662336661 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0204081632653 0.0309702414327 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.0887237588012 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181405895692 0.0209618222197 87% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136054421769 0.0139019557991 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2414.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 394.0 408.028673835 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1269035533 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378172588832 0.338922669872 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256345177665 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197969543147 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142131979695 0.112833075102 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87662336661 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 66.1917772961 59.2087087015 112% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1764705882 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4849869112 48.84282405 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 120.699889404 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 20.5533526081 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.644075263715 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 48.8109883547 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.35593220339 1.45489161554 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361829041829 0.300154397459 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0669395931522 0.103427244359 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650726606767 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.479536631379 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190293383959 0.151897553556 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140799141638 0.114077575197 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758091260026 0.0781384742642 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.331610627492 0.336927656856 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0488706147068 0.067059652881 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249384245269 0.210909579961 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526476089415 0.0618886996521 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.