do you agree or disagree? people nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past or not.
The question is whether people nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this view; however I am inclined to affirm this statement. There are some reasons for this claim that I will tender in following and those reasons will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that people today's earn enough money. Despite of huge mass of economics troubles in the society, there are numerous families who live in a fair circumstance. It is obvious that the entrepreneurs have provided a lot of work in community; hence the percentage of unemployment has reduced, although there is still poor cortex; therefore people with steady income prefer to allot amount of their income for needy families.
The second reason why I advocate this idea lies in the fact that the technology has changed everything in the world; consequently the news can be published faster and people are able to gain the newest statistics about their country. The tank for the invention of internet, smartphones, tablets and digital cameras which help us to announce some evidences about poor people (like publishing some photos about condition of their life, their address and their telephone number and so on) to each other.
I am going to empower my arguments with following discussion. Nobody could overlook this fact that people with kind heart and spiritual soul have always been during the history; however today's some groups have gathered and created some institutions with the objectives of helping to poor patients, homeless children and other needful people. Their active members try to provide some papers to invite other people for joining to these types of charities. Again the existence of technology plays a crucial role here for fast publishing information (airplane, car, phone, fast post...)
By taking all above mentioned arguments this conclusion could be drawn that nowadays people have more opportunities compared with the past for helping each other with having sufficient income, getting information through internet and the attendance of charity institutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-29 | peerless alex | 76 | view |
- Some people feel that humans should be able to dig for oil anywhere, as long as it benefits mankind. Other believes that certain areas of land should be reserved for animals use. Which do you think is better? 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 90
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, still, then, therefore, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20786516854 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63110946716 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2557828586 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255567885658 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11102049217 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189951012792 0.0737576698707 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144770156088 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926338289098 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.