do you agree or disagree? people who have deep relationships for ling time are happier than people who make new friends easily
Since the beginning of the current century, communication with people has become essential. Some people believe that deep relationships with a small number of people are more significant than making new friends quickly; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, making new friends and extent relationships is very crucial, given that it has a positive impact on people's personality, success, and communications. Below I will strive my supporting points in more detail,
The first and foremost point, related good to many people affect humans' personality. A vivid example that can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above is that people from developing countries usually immigrate looking for a better life. Provided that they moved from their countries, they will leave their old friends. Making new friends in other countries is imperative to continue their lives. Consequently, the ability to be flexible and engage easily with new friends has a significant influence on people's forward steps.
Next, coupled with flexibility, success is another reason for the ability to make new friends easily. Having new friends has excellent benefits, given that it could provide people with a new experience. A recent survey conducted by The University of Toronto found that people who could have lots of friends earn the critical element of success. Not only they have functional social networks, but also they could understand different people's habits. Therefore, relating well to lots of friends is significant.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones to cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. There is another subtle point that must be born in mind. People who make new friends fast have better communication skills. For instance, the prestigious IT companies such as Facebook, Microsoft, and Apple usually want their employees to have the ability for teamwork. Provided that employees easily communicate and accept others, they can work in a team which will boot companies' productivity. As a result, having good social networks improves people's skills.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, people who can make new friends easily are happier. It is suggested that people compromise and ensure to achieve profound/superficial relationships balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | Christine hanna | 83 | view |
- the stricter regulation for handling and storing coal ash 73
- tpo 34 the reasons OF Steller's sea cow extinction 80
- Adults today are more independent and can make decisions without their parents' support? agree or disagree 80
- people should never make an important decision alone 70
- do you agree or disagree? it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...le believe that deep relationships with a small number of people are more significant than making...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42204301075 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94159605309 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7364332444 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0476190476 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402901681024 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123766120683 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992800830183 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245489269996 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570929230347 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.