do you agree or disagree? teachers should not make their political or social views known in the classrooms?
Since the beginning of the last century, the education has become very significant to our community. Teachers are the most influential factor in the learning process, given that students are affected with their behaviors and ideas. Some people hold the view that teaches should be allowed to reveal their political view in the classrooms, however there is a solid body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, teachers should not make any social or political views known to students given that they could mislead students, waste their time, and trigger a dispute. Below I will strive my supporting points in more details.
The fist and foremost point, teachers may hold wrong or bad political view. For example in Egypt during the president election on 2013 some of the teachers wanted to vote to the Muslim Brotherhood candidate and they started to convince the students to vote to the same candidate because they have special agenda which had a bad impact on the Egyptian society. provided that teachers hold an unfair political view, they may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as a role models; so they could follow their behavior. Consequently, teachers should not state their political and social point of view in classrooms.
Next, coupled with mislead, wasting time is another reason why teachers should not make their political views known. Talking about the political subjects may not benefit the students academically. The noteworthy refreshing intelligible statistics revealed by a recent survey conducted by Oxford university found that debate on the political stuffs inside the classrooms could waste students’ time and minimize the learning potential outcomes. Furthermore, there are lots of important subjects that students should learn about to keep themselves update about the huge progress and improvement in several filed such as science and literature, any time waste can delay or jeopardize students’ success. Therefore, teachers should focus on teaching the academic subjects.
Although the previous reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at a glance, they are not the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle point which should be born in mind. Teaches post their political point of views, student may support or oppose each attitude according to their received information or conducted research. To put it in another word, students could differ in their political attitude which could trigger a dispute between them. Provided that teachers cannot control the conversation between the students, it can adversely affect their relationships. As a result, losing friends can be a negative impact of sharing political views by teachers.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt the teachers should not talk about their political and social perspectives in the classrooms. It is suggested that schools inform their teachers about the negative impacts of sharing political views in the classrooms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 83 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? people, who have few friends stable for a long time are happier than people who can make new friends easily? 80
- tpo 54 3
- people today are so busy doing many things, they do few things well? 76
- tpo 25 86
- celebrities' opinions are more important to younger people than older people? 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my supporting points in more details. The fist and foremost point, teachers ma...
^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t during the president election on 2013 some of the teachers wanted to vote to the Muslim B...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Provided
...d a bad impact on the Egyptian society. provided that teachers hold an unfair political ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hey may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as a ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd social point of view in classrooms. Next, coupled with mislead, wasting time...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cus on teaching the academic subjects. Although the previous reasons are the fi...
^^
Line 4, column 683, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of sharing political views by teachers. Taking everything into consideration, wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring political views in the classrooms.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in fact, such as, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41684210526 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75572755348 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513684210526 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2322733887 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.869565217 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352358263555 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12069122232 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101881406703 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226351549212 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047874685438 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.