Do you agree or disagree? Universities should spend more money on improving facilities than on hiring famous professors.
The question is whether the universities should spend much more money for providing more facilities or they should employ well-known professors. Everyone in consideration to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to declare that new and more facilities can bring us numerous advantages. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, one should notice that creating an appropriate atmosphere which contributes to improve the studying condition for students, plays a crucial role in the prosperity road. A university with a reasonable budget has an opportunity to renew old stuff or supersede them with up-dated facilities. For instance, the most important parts in every university are the library and the laboratory; hence, the investment in such educational spaces will have constructive consequence. Providing the newest published books or the best quality of internet, repairing old seats and tables, equipping the laboratories with the safest materials all and all can help the colleges to boost the chance of their success. Meanwhile, this money would be applied to recreate the coffee-houses, sport salons and amphitheaters. It goes without saying that students performance have a direct connection with happiness and joy; consequently, the university has to assist them in obtaining positive energy.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that the reputation of a university is associate with its students' researches. One should not forget that the young people confront usually lack of money for doing their proposals. If the dean of university dedicates a huge amount of money for such great activities, the students will spread their research scope. This circumstance can affect the society because the entrepreneurial beds can dominate among people; subsequently, the unemployment troubles will be solved.
Moreover, nowadays the technology has caused students to access a variety of data and fresh discoveries through internet; therefore whether an eminent professor or an ordinary young professor does not make difference in students' mind. Hiring a famous professor is not a promissory note in improving education.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the universities must spend money for research and outdoor activities because their first task is increasing of self-confidence and pleasure in students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-06-12 | peerless alex | 80 | view |
- tpo24 80
- Tpo3 69
- TPO 19_ Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo15 80
- do you agree or disagree? hether all university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field study. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: ALL_AND_ALL[1]
Message: This phrase is nonstandard. Did you mean 'all in all' (=after all, nevertheless)?
Suggestion: all in all
... laboratories with the safest materials all and all can help the colleges to boost the chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 842, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...hitheaters. It goes without saying that students performance have a direct connection wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'confront'.
Suggestion: usually confront
...should not forget that the young people confront usually lack of money for doing their proposals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57519788918 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09508015524 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604221635884 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4164513784 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.866666667 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205531948081 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713634512314 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854053528006 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105907292641 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492801627424 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.