Do you agree or disagree? The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
Although many believe people dress is one of the good indicator of his personality or character, I on the other hand believe we cannot understand many things about people character or personality just by their dress. I will address the most discernible reasons in the following why I feel this way.
To begin with, I believe judging people from their cloths is very superficial. People use different cloths for different task. Thus, the way they dress is not a good indicator to know his personality, we often can guess their works by their cloths not their characters. For instance, I when I bought my new appartment when I saw my neighbor I though he was not a good man, because he dressed casually and his cloths was always dirty. When I talked with my other neighbor about him he told me he is the best Mechanic in the town and he helped poor people. Accordingly I believe the way people dress is a superficial way to learn about people personality.
Moreover, understanding people is a log term process, therefore people need a lot of time to learn others personality and character. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was student, one of my classmate always dressed expensive cloths. I though he must be nice guy and clever. After a while, we became close friends. After one year, I noticed he was very selfish and did not care others. It learned me if I wanted to know about people personality I should spend long time with them insted of just looking in how their dress.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe the way people dress is not a good element of their personality because it is a superficail way, and because understanding others personality is a long term process.
- Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone? 70
- Agree or disagree Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 69
- Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past 73
- Writing task one TPO 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who cannot accept criticism from others cannot be successful at working in a group Use reasons and examples to explain your choice. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hbor about him he told me he is the best Mechanic in the town and he helped poor ...
^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
... in the town and he helped poor people. Accordingly I believe the way people dress is a sup...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use it is a superficail way, and because understanding others personality is a lo...
^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...rficail way, and because understanding others personality is a long term process.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68506493506 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81486391258 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496753246753 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0214142812 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1875 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286938745509 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910968910497 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945499898297 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208831529506 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627373527593 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.