Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take too many jobs away from humans who are currently paid to do them. Which view do you agree with and why?
Although many believe robots and computers will harm many careers in the near future, I on the other hand believe new technologhy such as robots and computers will not treat human jobs any more and their are beneficial for human beigns.. I will address the most discernible reasons why I feel this way in the following.
To begin with, when new technolgy create, new jobs will create as well. Thus, some jobs remove from the market and some will crate. So I strongly beleive robots and computers will provide diffrent jobs not eliminate that. For instance, I have worked in a car making company. Two years ago our manager decided to use robots in some parts of our company. Many worker feared of their decision, because they tough they will be fired. Very soon all worker noticed they would not loos their job. Our manager forced some employee to learnd how to use nw robots and continued saved their job. Accordingly, new technology like computers and robots will change the jobs name and methods and will not elliminate them.
Moreover, saving employees life is one of the companies priorities. Therefore, more managers tend to improve their work space safty. Robots provide companies this opportuniies, inorder to they can use in dangreas works conditions. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I mentioned I have worked in car making comapny and our managers bought new robots. They used them for welding and painting, which are very dangrace works for human. The resulat was great, because less worker complained obout they hard work situation.
The last but not the least, Robots and computers need human operators. Wheich means companies will need to hire more proficional employee insted of fire them. to share personal experience. Last year I funded my own company and hired many people to just operate my computers. If I would not use computer in my company I did not need them. This Illusterate computers and robots provide more job opportunity.
In conclusion, it is for all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe computers and robots will be pisitive effects for humans becaue they change some type of career, and becaue they provide more job safty, and because they also need humans to control them.
- Some high school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly inv 60
- Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more willing to help other people (giving food or clothing) than in the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 42
- Imagine that you are a student at a university where there are long breaks between semesters. The university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break.- Students must take a course which has no direct connection to th 70
- T P O 52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... will not treat human jobs any more and their are beneficial for human beigns.. I wil...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...nd their are beneficial for human beigns.. I will address the most discernible rea...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun worker seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many workers'.
Suggestion: Many workers
...se robots in some parts of our company. Many worker feared of their decision, because they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...ke computers and robots will change the jobs name and methods and will not elliminat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ot elliminate them. Moreover, saving employees life is one of the companies priorities...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less work'?
Suggestion: less work
...r human. The resulat was great, because less worker complained obout they hard work situati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...oficional employee insted of fire them. to share personal experience. Last year I ...
^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ny people to just operate my computers. If I would not use computer in my company ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9549071618 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51157078616 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519893899204 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7516935678 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.72 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.08 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358404342766 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945364796961 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788557161351 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219635586017 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688378282302 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.