Do you agree or disagree: The way people dressed is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
Today with the galloping growth rate of fashion companies, people with different characters and beliefs can buy and dress various formal, casual, and sportswear that are not agree with their personalities. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that people are judged by others according to the way they dressed. On the other extreme of the rope, others definitely believe that wearing different and various clothing is a personal issue and doesn't indicate and reflect a person's personality and belief. Although, both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I deeply believe that the latter group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will explain my point of view by using specific reasons.
As the first and paramount reason, many people dress similar clothing but they may have fundamentally different personalities and beliefs. In other words, everyone in society with different religious beliefs, approaches, and styles of life can dress some special clothing which does not have any coincidence with his or her personality. For instance, some students in a psychology department in a university studied two groups of professors who dressed a uniform and were from different countries and tried to define the meaningful relationship between the way they dressed and social behavior and their beliefs. The results of that research were obvious. The researchers declared that all professors have the same style and clothing, but have different abilities, beliefs, personality, approaches, and insights; thus, the way they dressed is not a rational indication of their personality.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate my reason is, a person dresses differently in different places and situations. To be more specific, selecting and wearing different clothing depends on places where we are going to go; hence, coinciding the way people dress clothing to their beliefs, abilities, and knowledge not only is meaningless but also is extremely absurd. For example, about two years ago a computer company invited one of my friends who didn’t have any knowledge and information about quality control and economy for a formal job interview. On the day of the interview, she dressed the uniform of that company and persuaded managers to accept her application. Finally, some engineers and managers who judged my friend by her style of clothing and didn’t consider her knowledge and abilities employed her because of the attractive way she dressed. After six months, my friend couldn’t complete the company's project properly and efficiently and they couldn’t deliver the orders to the customers on due dates. Subsequently, that company ruined its reputation. Therefore, people should know that persons’ clothes don’t reflect their beliefs and abilities.
In conclusion, people may fundamentally are different from each other, but dress similar clothes. In addition, people shouldn’t evaluate and judge others’ characteristics by their appearance. Since clothing is the first impression but it is not the last impression. Consequently, the most significant factor of people’s life is their abilities and knowledge dealing with different problems; moreover, the way they dressed is not important and will not reflect their personality.
- TPO8The television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 73
- TPO11Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. 73
- Which one do you prefer：1) a company offering you a job with a challenging and interesting project but fewer vacation days or2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but more vacation days. 73
- TPO8- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...al, casual, and sportswear that are not agree with their personalities. Some people a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...arious clothing is a personal issue and doesnt indicate and reflect a persons personal...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 477, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...issue and doesnt indicate and reflect a persons personality and belief. Although, both ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ional indication of their personality. The second reason coming to my mind to subs...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 13.8261648746 268% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2820.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58415841584 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04028824497 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512871287129 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0340334355 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9545454545 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210536229806 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064361483412 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452603846614 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139011707543 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024428928402 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.