Do you think employers should make it mandatory for older staff to take additional college courses in order to keep up with changes in their industry? Why?
Do you think employers should make it mandatory for older staff to take additional college courses in order to keep up with changes in their industry? Why?
It is axiomatic that in today's sophisticated world, the enjoyment of a well-informed workforce plays a vital role in thriving an industry. Besides, being familiar with the new generation of technology is a prerequisite for meeting this goal. To be more specific, the techniques and theories that veterans have learned, even a decade ago, are becoming increasingly obsolete and cannot be useful as a whole. By considering this, I firmly believe that forcing older staff to take additional college courses is, to some extent, reasonable, which enables companies to set themselves apart from other competitors and keep up with the ever-increasing rate of emerging technologies.
First, by not having adequate knowledge of today's state-of-the-art technology, older staff cannot handle projects as they ought to. With the development of industry, the workforce should, undoubtedly, be equipped with a variety of knowledge on how to adjust the equipment to work correctly. To be sure, the lack of sufficient insight into their field of study will lead them to be more error-prone in carrying out their tasks, so it causes forfeiture of money. From another perspective, it seems that as the older staff loyalty has been proven to the company, forcing them to broaden their horizons would be a kind of foresight. That is to say, by hinging on new-hired employees, companies may face dire strait. As an illustration, if another company offers more pay, the likelihood of a novice workforce dropping out of their current occupation and becoming eager to be employed in the new company is greater than the older staff. The point is that relying on particular employees can be problematic to such an extent that it turns a lucrative company into a debt-laden one and culminates in bankruptcy.
Second, the staff’s scientific level discrepancy can be a hotbed of disaccord in any workplace. As is evident to anyone, holding a position in a company has become more complicated than before, and young people need to put in a great deal of time and effort to be qualified for a particular company interview. Under such a circumstance, newly-hired staff expect their co-workers to be at their level, enabling them to share their thoughts and become prosperous in the workplace. Above all, should the staff not be at the same status, not only will they not be able to put their ideas into practice, but it is also more likely that it lays the foundation for unhealthy competition among old and new staff. In other words, the senior personnel tries to undermine the younger ones' abilities to maintain their prestige. As a result, the younger workers will be under pressure, and the workplace will be stressful. This means that the greater the equality of scientific level of staff, the better the chances of keeping up with the changes in the industries.
In conclusion, forcing older staff to take additional college courses provides better workplace conditions. This is because senior employees will become more knowledgeable, and companies will not rely only on the newly-hired workforce. Another reason is that the co-workers' opinions will not be so different from one another's, and they can work more in coordination with each other, which will result in a greater chance of coming up with a novel idea.
- People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that are very different from what they do at work 70
- Universities should spend more money in improving facilities like libraries and computer labs rather than hiring famous teachers 60
- Some people believe that it is good idea for the athletes and entertainers to go into politics while others think that professional athletes and entertainers should not become politicians Which do you agree with and why 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it is important for government to provide money for things that are beautiful not just for things that are practical 60
- Some people believe that the best way for the government to help the economy is to provide free education to all its citizens Others argue that this would be too expensive and actually harm the economy 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 52.1666666667 180% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2890.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 569.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07908611599 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94868564806 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499121265378 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 899.1 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2470399041 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.363636364 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8636363636 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323032653695 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105468053501 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19652861793 0.0737576698707 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306975393926 0.150856017488 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.346688770817 0.0645574589148 537% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.